首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biomechanics >Muscle force estimation in clinical gait analysis using AnyBody and OpenSim
【24h】

Muscle force estimation in clinical gait analysis using AnyBody and OpenSim

机译:使用任何人和Opensim临床步态分析中的肌肉力估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A variety of musculoskeletal models are applied in different modelling environments for estimating muscle forces during gait. Influence of different modelling assumptions and approaches on model outputs are still not fully understood, while direct comparisons of standard approaches have been rarely undertaken. This study seeks to compare joint kinematics, joint kinetics and estimated muscle forces of two standard approaches offered in two different modelling environments (AnyBody, OpenSim). It is hypothesised that distinctive differences exist for individual muscles, while summing up synergists show general agreement. Experimental data of 10 healthy participants (28 +/- 5 years, 1.72 +/- 0.08 m, 69 +/- 12 kg) was used for a standard static optimisation muscle force estimation routine in AnyBody and OpenSim while using two gait-specific musculoskeletal models. Statistical parameter mapping paired t-test was used to compare joint angle, moment and muscle force waveforms in Matlab. Results showed differences especially in sagittal ankle and hip angles as well as sagittal knee moments. Differences were also found for some of the muscles, especially of the triceps surae group and the biceps femoris short head, which occur as a result of different anthropometric and anatomical definitions (mass and inertia of segments, muscle properties) and scaling procedures (static vs. dynamic). Understanding these differences and their cause is crucial to operate such modelling environments in a clinical setting. Future research should focus on alternatives to classical generic musculoskeletal models (e.g. implementation of functional calibration tasks), while using experimental data reflecting normal and pathological gait to gain a better understanding of variations and divergent behaviour between approaches. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在不同的建模环境中应用各种肌肉骨骼模型,用于在步态期间估计肌肉力。不同建模假设的影响和模型输出的方法仍然不完全理解,而标准方法的直接比较已经很少进行。本研究旨在比较两个不同建模环境(任何人,OpenSim)所提供的两个标准方法的关节运动学,关节动力学和估计的肌肉力量。假设个体肌肉存在鲜明的差异,同时总结协同作者展示了一般协议。 10个健康参与者的实验数据(28 +/- 5岁,1.72 +/- 0.08米,69 +/- 12千克)用于任何人和Opensim的标准静态优化肌肉估计常规,同时使用两个步态特异性肌肉骨骼楷模。统计参数映射配对T检验用于比较Matlab中的关节角度,时刻和肌肉力波形。结果表明差异差异,特别是矢状踝和臀部角度以及矢状膝关节矩。对于一些肌肉,特别是Triceps Surae组和二头肌股骨短头的差异也发现,这是由于不同的人类测量和解剖定义(分段,肌肉特性)和缩放程序的质量和惯性(静态VS)而发生。 动态的)。了解这些差异及其原因对于在临床环境中运营这种建模环境至关重要。未来的研究应专注于经典通用肌肉骨骼模型的替代品(例如,功能校准任务的实施),同时使用反映正常和病理步态的实验数据,以更好地了解方法之间的变化和不同行为。 (c)2019年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号