首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biomechanics >Most marathon runners at the 2017 IAAF World Championships were rearfoot strikers, and most did not change footstrike pattern
【24h】

Most marathon runners at the 2017 IAAF World Championships were rearfoot strikers, and most did not change footstrike pattern

机译:2017年国际亚太区世界锦标赛的大多数马拉松运动员都是后宠罢工者,大多数人都没有改变足迹模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to analyze footstrike patterns in elite marathon runners at the 2017 IAAF World Championships. Seventy-one men and 78 women were analyzed in their respective races. Athletes' foot strike patterns were recorded (120 Hz) at approximately 8.5, 19, 29.5 and 40 km ("Laps 1 - 4") and categorized as either rearfoot (RFS), midfoot or forefoot striking; the latter two were classified together as non-rearfoot striking (NRFS). The most common footstrike pattern was RFS, with proportions never less than 54% of men or 67% of women at any distance. There were no sex-based differences for proportion of footstrike patterns, and there were no differences between footstrike proportions when comparing the top and bottom 50% of men finishers, or between women during Laps 1 and 2. A greater proportion of the top 50% of women maintained NRFS than amongst the bottom 50%. The proportion of RFS increased with distance run in the men's race, although more than 75% of athletes across both marathons had consistent footstrike patterns between laps (79 RFS and 36 NRFS). As most athletes were RFS (including the top four finishing men), there appears to be no clear advantage to NRFS in marathon running. Coaches should note that it is normal for elite marathon runners to be either RFS or NRFS; however, forefoot striking was rare. The high proportion of athletes who maintained their footstrike pattern reflected individualized preferences for a given footstrike pattern. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究的目的是在2017年国际亚太区世界锦标赛中分析Elite Marathon Runners的足球仪模式。在各自的比赛中分析了七十一名男子和78名女性。在大约8.5,19,29.5和40km(“圈1 - 4”)上被记录(120 Hz)(120 Hz),并作为后脚(RFS),中足或前掌的引人注目;后两者被分类为非后脚击中(NRF)。最常见的足迹模式是RFS,比例从未少于54%的男性或67%的女性在任何距离。徒步旅行仪模式的比例没有基于性的差异,在比较男性整理者的顶部和底部50%或在圈1和2期间女性之间的脚底和底部之间没有差异。比例更大的50%女性维持NRF比下半年50%。 RFS的比例随着男性的比赛的距离而增加,虽然超过75%的马拉松运动员的运动员在圈之间的一致足迹模式(79 rfs和36个nrfs)。由于大多数运动员是RFS(包括前四名饰面男性),在马拉松赛跑中没有明确的优势。教练应该注意,精英马拉松赛者是RFS或NRF的正常情况;然而,前足引人注目是罕见的。长比例的运动员,他们维持其脚步的模式,反映了给定足迹模式的个体化偏好。 (c)2019年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号