首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biomechanics >Introducing a novel test with unanticipated medial/lateral diagonal hops that reliably captures hip and knee kinematics in healthy women
【24h】

Introducing a novel test with unanticipated medial/lateral diagonal hops that reliably captures hip and knee kinematics in healthy women

机译:用意外内侧/横向对角线跳跃引入一种新型测试,可靠地捕获健康女性的臀部和膝关节运动学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite a vast literature on one-leg hops and cutting maneuvers assessing knee control pre/post-injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), comprehensive and reliable tests performed under unpredictable conditions are lacking. This study aimed to: (1) assess the feasibility of an innovative, knee challenging, one-leg double-hop test consisting of a forward hop followed by a diagonal hop (45) performed medially (UMDH) or laterally (ULDH) in an unanticipated manner; and (2) determine within- and between-session reliability for 3-dimensional hip and knee kinematics and kinetics of these tests. Twenty-two healthy women (22.3 +/- 3.3 years) performed three successful UMDH and ULDH, twice 1-4 weeks apart. Hop success rate was 69-84%. Peak hip and knee angles demonstrated moderate to excellent within-session reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.99, standard error of measurement [SEM] = 3 degrees) and poor to excellent between-session reliability (ICC CI: 0.22-0.94, SEM = 3 degrees) for UMDH and ULDH. The smallest real difference (SRD) was low (= 5 degrees) for nearly all peak angles. Peak hip and knee moments demonstrated poor to excellent reliability (ICC CI: 0-0.97) and, in general, moments were more reliable within-session (SEM = 0.14 N.m/kg.m, both directions) than between-session (SRD = 0.43 N.m/kg.m). Our novel test was feasible and, in most but not all cases, provided reliable angle estimates (within-session between-session, both directions) albeit less reliable moments (within-session between-session, both directions). The relatively large hip and knee movements in the frontal and transverse planes during the unanticipated hops suggest substantial challenge of dynamic knee control. Thus, the test seems appropriate for evaluating knee function during ACL injury rehabilitation. (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:尽管在单腿跳跃和评估膝关节控制前/后损伤的膝关节韧带(ACL)的膝关节损伤(ACL)进行了巨大的文献,但缺乏在不可预测的条件下进行的全面且可靠的测试。本研究旨在:(1)评估创新,膝关节挑战的可行性,由前向跳组成的一腿双跳测试,后跟对角线跳(45)在内侧(UMDH)或横向(ULDH)中进行意外的方式; (2)确定3维髋关节和膝关节运动学和这些测试动力学的会议之间的和之间的与之间的可靠性。二十两名健康女性(22.3 +/- 3.3岁)进行了三次成功的UMDH和ULDH,分别为1-4周。跳跃成功率为69-84%。峰值臀部和膝盖角度显示中度至优异的会话内可靠性(脑内相关系数[ICC] 95%置信区间[CI]:0.67-0.99,测量标准误差[SEM]& = 3度)和差-Session可靠性(ICC CI:0.22-0.94,SEM& = 3度)用于UMDH和ULDH。几乎所有峰角的最小真实差异(SRD)低(& = 5度)。峰值臀部和膝关节矩显示出差的可靠性差(ICC CI:0-0.97),通常,在会话内(SEM = 0.14nm / kg.m,两个方向)更可靠的时刻( SRD& = 0.43 nm / kg.m)。我们的小说测试是可行的,并且在大多数情况下,除了所有情况下,提供可靠的角度估计(会话内,在会话之间,两个方向之间)尽管可靠的时刻(在会话中,在会话之间,两个方向之间)。在意外啤酒花期间,正面和横向平面中的相对较大的臀部和膝关节运动表明了动态膝关节控制的大量挑战。因此,测试似乎适用于ACL损伤康复期间的膝关节功能。 (c)2018提交人。 elsevier有限公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号