首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biomechanics >Foot centre of pressure and ground reaction force during quadriceps resistance exercises; a comparison between force plates and a pressure insole system
【24h】

Foot centre of pressure and ground reaction force during quadriceps resistance exercises; a comparison between force plates and a pressure insole system

机译:曲面培训型锻炼期间压力和地面反作用力的脚中心; 力板与压力鞋底系统之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The study compared the centre of pressure measurements (COP) and vertical ground reaction forces (vGRF) from a pressure insole system to that from force plates (FP) during two flywheel quadriceps resistance exercises: leg press and squat. The comparison was performed using a motion capture system and simultaneous measurements of COP and vGRF from FP and insoles. At lower insole-vGRF (<250 N/insole) COP accuracy deteriorated and those data were excluded from further analysis. The insoles systematically displaced the COP slightly posteriorly and medially compared to the FP measurements. Pearson's coefficient of correlation (r) between insole- and FP-COP showed good agreement in both the anteroposterior (squat: r = 0.96, leg press: r = 0.97) and mediolateral direction (squat: r = 0.84, leg press: r = 0.90), whereas the root-mean-square errors (RMSE) were lower in the mediolateral (squat: 3.9 mm, leg press: 4.5 mm) than the anteroposterior (squat and leg press: 11.8 mm) direction. Vertical GRF was slightly overestimated by the insoles in leg press and RMSE were greater in leg press (8% of peak force) than in squat (6%). Overall, results were within the range of previous studies performed on gait. The strong agreement between insole and FP measurements indicates that insoles may replace FPs in field applications and biomechanical computations during resistance exercise, provided that the applied force is sufficient. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:该研究将压力测量(COP)和垂直地反作用力(VGRF)与来自压力板(FP)的压力测量(COP)和垂直接地反作用力(VGRF)与两种飞轮Quaddriceps抗性锻炼中的压力板(FP)进行比较:腿部压力和蹲下。使用运动捕获系统和来自FP和鞋垫的COP和VGRF的同时进行比较。在较低的鞋垫-VGRF(<250n /鞋底)COP精度恶化,并且这些数据被排除在进一步的分析之外。与FP测量相比,鞋垫系统地将警察略微向后移位。 Pearson在鞋垫和FP-COP之间的相关系数(R)在前后剂量(Squat:R = 0.96,腿部压力机:R = 0.97)和MedioLate方向(Squat:R = 0.84,腿部按下:R = 0.90),而在Mediolateral(Squat:3.9mm,腿部压力机:4.5mm)中,根平均方形误差(RMSE)较低,而不是前后(蹲伏和腿部)方向。垂直GRF通过腿部压力鞋底略微高估,并且RMSE在腿部(峰值力的8%)中大于蹲伏(6%)。总体而言,结果是在步态上进行的先前研究的范围内。鞋垫和FP测量之间的强烈一致性表明,如果施加的力足够,则鞋垫可以替换现场应用中的FPS和生物力学计算。 (c)2019年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号