...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >Disparities in complementary alternative medicine use and asthma exacerbation in the United States
【24h】

Disparities in complementary alternative medicine use and asthma exacerbation in the United States

机译:在美国互补替代药物使用和哮喘恶化的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) are associated with poor asthma medication adherence, a major risk factor for asthma exacerbation. However, previous studies showed inconsistent relationships between CAM use and asthma control due to small sample sizes, demographic differences across populations studied, and poor differentiation of CAM types. Methods: We examined associations between CAM use and asthma exacerbation using a cross-sectional analysis of the 2012 National Health Interview Survey. We included adults >= 18 years with current asthma (n = 2,736) to analyze racial/ethnic differences in CAM use as well as the association between CAM use and both asthma exacerbation and emergency department (ED) visit for asthma exacerbation across racial/ethnic groups. We ran descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regressions. Result: Blacks (OR = 0.63 [0.49-0.81]) and Hispanics (OR = 0.66 [0.48-0.92]) had decreased odds of using CAM compared to Whites. Overall, there was no association between CAM use and asthma exacerbation (OR = 0.99 [0.79-1.25]) but the subgroup of 'other complementary approaches' was associated with increased odds of asthma exacerbation among all survey respondents (1.90 [1.21-2.97]), Whites (OR = 1.90 [1.21-2.97]), and Hispanics (OR = 1.43 [0.98-2.09). CAM use was associated with decreased odds of an ED visit for asthma exacerbation (OR = 0.65 [0.45-0.93]). These associations were different among racial/ethnic groups with decreased odds of ED visit among Whites (OR = 0.50 [0.32-0.78]) but no association among Blacks and Hispanics. Conclusion: We found that both CAM use and the association between CAM use and asthma exacerbation varied by racial/ethnic group. The different relationship may arise from how CAM is used to complement or to substitute for conventional asthma management.
机译:背景:互补和替代药物(CAM)与哮喘缺乏差,哮喘加剧的主要危险因素有关。然而,由于小样本尺寸,所研究的种群的小小的人口差异,并且凸轮类型的分化差异,凸轮使用和哮喘控制之间的关系呈现不一致。方法:我们使用2012年全国卫生面试调查的横截面分析检查了CAM使用和哮喘恶化之间的关联。我们包括成年人> = 18年,目前的哮喘(n = 2,736)分析CAM使用的种族/民族差异以及凸轮使用与哮喘发作和急诊部(ED)参观种族/民族的哮喘加剧团体。我们跑了描述性统计和多变量的逻辑回归。结果:黑人(或= 0.63 [0.49-0.81])和西班牙裔(或= 0.66 [0.48-0.92])与白人相比,使用凸轮的几率降低。总体而言,CAM使用和哮喘急促之间没有关联(或= 0.99 [0.79-1.25]),但“其他互补方法”的亚组与所有调查受访者之间的哮喘加剧的可能性增加有关(1.90 [1.21-2.97] ),白人(或= 1.90 [1.21-2.97])和西班牙裔(或= 1.43 [0.98-2.09)。 CAM使用有关的是哮喘加剧的ED访问的几率降低(OR = 0.65 [0.45-0.93])。这些协会在种族/族裔群体中是不同的,随着白人的ED访问的几率降低(或= 0.50.78]),但黑人和西班牙裔之间没有关联。结论:我们发现凸轮使用和凸轮使用与哮喘的关联和种族/族裔群体之间的关系。不同的关系可能会引起凸轮如何补充或替代传统的哮喘管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号