...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics >Atmospheric phase screen estimation for land subsidence evaluation by InSAR time series analysis in Kurdistan, Iran
【24h】

Atmospheric phase screen estimation for land subsidence evaluation by InSAR time series analysis in Kurdistan, Iran

机译:Kurdistan,Iran Insar时间序列分析的土地沉降评估大气相估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Atmospheric phase screen (APS) is one of the main error sources of interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) measurements. In order to accurately retrieve displacement fields, it is necessary to use advanced methods to eliminate the tropospheric effect of interferograms. In this paper, the land subsidence in Kurdistan province of Iran is investigated using Sentinel-1A acquisitions on a single track for the period 2014-2018. The accurate and applicable 3D ray tracing technique is used to accurately estimate the APS. The ERA-I reanalysis data generated by European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) are used to implement the 3D ray tracing technique. In order to determine the effect of using the 3D ray tracing technique, the APSs are also determined using a traditional approach called, spatiotemporal filters method. To evaluate the capability of the two methods, the results are compared with the weather research and forecasting model (WRF) model. Finally, the interferograms are corrected using APSs from 3D ray tracing technique and traditional method and the subsidence rate in the study area is computed. Comparing the subsidence rates obtained from two APS estimation methods with piezometric data, GPS and precise levelling observations shows that the 3D ray tracing technique is significantly more accurate than traditional method in computing InSAR displacement fields.
机译:大气相屏(APS)是干涉式合成孔径雷达(INSAR)测量的主要误差源之一。为了准确地检索位移场,有必要使用先进的方法来消除干扰图的对流层效果。在本文中,在2014 - 2018年期间对一条赛道进行了哨兵-1A收购,调查了伊朗库尔德斯坦省的土地沉降。准确和适用的3D射线跟踪技术用于准确估计APS。由欧洲中距离天气预报(ECMWF)产生的ERA-I重新分析数据用于实现3D射线跟踪技术。为了确定使用3D射线跟踪技术的效果,还使用称为时空滤波器方法的传统方法来确定APS。为了评估两种方法的能力,将结果与天气研究和预测模型(WRF)模型进行比较。最后,使用来自3D射线跟踪技术的APSS校正干涉图,并且计算了研究区域中的传统方法和沉降率。比较从压力数据,GPS和精确的调平观察中的两个APS估计方法获得的沉降速率表明3D光线跟踪技术比计算insar位移场中的传统方法明显更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号