...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics >A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos.
【24h】

A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos.

机译:随机对照试验比较两种玻璃化方法与缓慢冷冻保存人类切割阶段胚胎的缓慢。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Both vitrification methods (Irvine and Vitrolife) are more efficient than slow freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos in terms of post-warming survival rate. No significant difference in the implantation rate was observed between the three cryopreservation methods.
机译:玻璃化方法(Irvine和Vitroife)比在温暖的存活率方面比慢冻结人类切割阶段胚胎的缓慢冻结更效率。 在三种冷冻保存方法之间观察到植入率没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号