首页> 外文期刊>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics >A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos.
【24h】

A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos.

机译:一项随机对照试验,比较了两种玻璃化方法与慢速冷冻方法对人类卵裂期胚胎的冷冻保存。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Both vitrification methods (Irvine and Vitrolife) are more efficient than slow freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos in terms of post-warming survival rate. No significant difference in the implantation rate was observed between the three cryopreservation methods.
机译:就升温后的存活率而言,两种玻璃化方法(Irvine和Vitrolife)都比慢速冷冻冷冻保存人类卵裂期胚胎的效率更高。三种冷冻保存方法之间的植入率没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号