首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Remote Sensing >Comparison of optimization algorithms for interferometric synthetic aperture radar phase unwrapping based on identical Markov random fields
【24h】

Comparison of optimization algorithms for interferometric synthetic aperture radar phase unwrapping based on identical Markov random fields

机译:基于相同马尔可夫随机字段的干涉性合成孔径雷达相位展开的优化算法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Phase unwrapping (PU) is one of the key processes in measuring the elevation or deformation of the Earth's surface from its interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data. PU problems may be formulated as maximum a posteriori estimation estimations of Markov random field (MRF). The key issue of this formulation is energy minimization. Iterated conditional mode (ICM), graph cuts (GC), loopy belief propagation (LBP), and sequential tree-reweighted message passing (TRW-S) have been proposed for the energy minimization. Unfortunately, they differ in the formulation of the MRF model for PU, which raises the question of how they compare against each other on the same MRF model for PU. We address this by investigating the four optimization algorithms and comparing them on an identical MRF model, which gives researchers some guidance as to which optimization method is best suited for solving the PU problem. Experiments using simulated and real-data illustrate that the GC algorithm is clearly the winner among the four algorithms in all cases. The ICM algorithm, although very rapid, performs much worse than the other three especially in the terrain with violent changes or discontinuities. The two message-passing algorithms-LBP and TRW-S-perform completely differently. The LBP algorithm performs surprisingly poorly on solving phase discontinuities issue, whereas the TRW-S algorithm does quite well (second only to the GC algorithm). (C) The Authors.
机译:相位展开(PU)是测量地球表面从其干涉性合成孔径雷达(INSAR)数据的仰角或变形的关键过程之一。 PU问题可以制定为Markov随机场(MRF)的最大后验估计估计。该配方的关键问题是能量最小化。已经提出了迭代条件模式(ICM),图形切割(GC),循环信仰传播(LBP)和顺序树重新传播消息通过(TRW-S)的能量最小化。遗憾的是,它们在PU的MRF模型的配方中不同,这提出了如何在PU的同一MRF模型上相互比较的问题。我们通过调查四种优化算法并将它们与相同的MRF模型进行比较来解决这一点,这为研究人员提供了一些指导,优化方法最适合解决PU问题。使用模拟和实数据的实验说明了GC算法显然是所有情况下四种算法中的获胜者。 ICM算法虽然非常迅速,但特别是三个特别是在地形中的剧烈变化或不连续性。两种消息传递算法-1bp和trw-s完全不同地执行。 LBP算法在解决阶段不连续性问题时表现出令人惊讶的是,而TRW-S算法非常好(仅限于GC算法)。 (c)作者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号