首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Remote Sensing >Comparing the theoretical performances of 1.65-and 3.3-mu m differential absorption lidar systems used for airborne remote sensing of natural gas leaks
【24h】

Comparing the theoretical performances of 1.65-and 3.3-mu m differential absorption lidar systems used for airborne remote sensing of natural gas leaks

机译:比较1.65和3.3-MU M微分吸收激光雷达系统的理论性能,用于空气偏远的天然气泄漏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Airborne remote sensing approaches to natural gas leak detection have recently become a viable alternative to traditional in situ surveillance methods. However, there have been few formal studies addressing the advantages and disadvantages of the various kinds of instruments typically employed for this purpose. This investigation compares the theoretical performances of differential absorption lidar systems operating near 1.65 and 3.3 mu m. The random errors affecting these instruments' respective retrievals were simulated over a range of aircraft altitudes and observed natural gas concentrations. It was found that the 3.3-mu m system is capable of measuring smaller leaks with less error than the 1.65-mu m system but only when flying at lower altitudes. The noise floors of the 1.65- and 3.3-mu m instruments simulated in this particular analysis are similar to 0.1 and similar to 1.4 ppmm, respectively. However, when flying at altitudes similar to 220 m or observing leaks with concentrations similar to 500 ppmm, the 1.65-mu m system exhibits better precision than the 3.3- mu m system. These results demonstrate that it may be more appropriate to employ one instrument over the other depending on the surveillance scenario at hand. (C) 2018 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).
机译:天然气泄漏检测的空中遥感方法最近成为传统风传动方法的可行替代品。然而,有很少的正规研究解决了通常用于此目的的各种仪器的优缺点。该调查比较了在1.65和3.3亩的差动吸收激光雷达系统的理论表演。影响这些仪器各自检索的随机误差是在一系列飞机高度和观察到的天然气浓度的模拟中。发现3.3-mu m系统能够测量比1.65-mu m系统更少的误差较小的泄漏,而是仅在较低的海拔地区飞行时。在该特定分析中模拟的1.65-和3.3-mu M仪器的噪声楼层分别类似于0.1且类似于1.4ppmm。然而,当在高度飞行时&类似于220米或观察浓度且浓度泄漏;类似于500 ppmm,1.65 mu m系统表现出比3.3-mu m系统更好的精确度。这些结果表明,根据手动监视场景,使用一个仪器可能更适合使用。 (c)2018年光学仪表工程师(SPIE)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号