Using multivariate techniques to assess the effects of raw material, flaking behavior and tool manufacture on assemblage variability: An example from the late Middle Paleolithic of the European Plain
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archaeological Science >Using multivariate techniques to assess the effects of raw material, flaking behavior and tool manufacture on assemblage variability: An example from the late Middle Paleolithic of the European Plain
【24h】

Using multivariate techniques to assess the effects of raw material, flaking behavior and tool manufacture on assemblage variability: An example from the late Middle Paleolithic of the European Plain

机译:利用多变量技术来评估原料,剥落行为和工具制造对组合变异性的影响:欧洲平原中古二思的中半前衣晚期的一个例子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AbstractThe late Middle Paleolithic in central and eastern Europe is defined by the presence or absence of certain bifacial tools and blank production methods. Hence, the assemblages between MIS 5a and MIS 3 are classified as Mousterian, Taubachian, Micoquian, Micoquo-Prondnikien, Pr?dnik cycle and Keilmessergruppen, among others. We like to address here the questions of what do these assemblages look like when the type fossils (“fossil directeur”) are set aside and what are the main drivers of variability within and between these assemblages. Therefore, we analyzed nine assemblages of four late Middle Paleolithic open-air sites of the European Plain: Pouch and K?nigsaue for central Germany, Wroc?aw-Hallera Av. for southwestern Poland and Khotylevo I-6-2 for western Russia. Our study is based on an attribute analysis of flakes, as they are the most numerous artifact type in the lithic assemblages, bearing traces of the flaking technology in their morphology. Linear and nonlinear multivariate statistical analyses of the flake attributes show similar patterns for the assemblages and show no distinctions between Mousterian and Micoquian assemblages aside from the type fossils. Additionally, assemblage variability is, except for one case, not site specific or regional. The analysis of the factors that drive within and between assemblage variability revealed that the assemblages are influenced by site preservation, raw material size and economy, as well as similar blank production and tool manufacture methods that are present in varying degrees in each assemblage. In other words, taking into account site preservation, the overall character o
机译:<![CDATA [ 抽象 中央和东欧的中间古石中间次数由某些双环工具和空白生产的存在或缺失定义方法。因此,MIS 5A和MIS 3之间的组装被归类为约泊尼亚,塔皮乔,Micoquian,Micoquo-Prondnienien,Pr?Dnik Cycle和Keilmessergruppen等。我们喜欢在这里解决这些组件的问题,当型化石(“化石指导”)被留下,并且在其中和之间的主要变化驱动因素是什么装配。因此,我们分析了欧洲平原的四个中肿近天近天露天场地的九个装配:Pouch和K?Nugsaue为德国中部,WROC?AW-Hallera AV。在波兰西南部和俄罗斯西南部的克豪省I-6-2。我们的研究基于薄片的属性分析,因为它们是岩石组合中最多的伪影类型,剥落技术的形态轴承痕迹。剥落属性的线性和非线性多变量统计分析显示了组合的类似模式,并且在除了化石之外的无关田和Micoquian组件之间没有区别。此外,除了一个案例之外,组装变异性,不是特定于网站或区域。分析在组装变异性内和之间驱动的因素显示,组装受到现场保存,原材料尺寸和经济的影响,以及类似的空白生产和工具制造方法,其在每个组合中的不同程度存在。换句话说,考虑到网站保存,整体角色o

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号