首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Aquatic Plant Management >Comparison of molecular markers to distinguish genotypes of Eurasian watermilfoil, northern watermilfoil, and their hybrids
【24h】

Comparison of molecular markers to distinguish genotypes of Eurasian watermilfoil, northern watermilfoil, and their hybrids

机译:分子标志物与区分欧亚西海尿素,北水利滤网基因型的比较及其杂种

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Managed aquatic plant taxa can exhibit genetic variation that is relevant to their growth, impacts, and control efficacy. For example, genotypes of hydrilla {Hydrilla verticillata L.f. Royle) differ in their degree of sensitivity to fluridone (Michelet al. 2004), and genetic screening of hydrilla populations can therefore be used to predict whether fluridone treatment will be efficacious on the specific genotypes present in a water body (Benoit and Les 2013). For most species, where, when, and how genetic variation will be important for management decisions and outcomes is still unknown. However, molecular markers can be used to quantify and monitor genetic variation across space and time, which holds potential to identify specific genotypes of interest (e.g., putatively herbicide-resistant genotypes) or changes in genetic variation that could signal important changes in population-level responses to management.Invasive Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatnm L.; EWM) is a highly managed aquatic plant in the United States. EWM hybridizes with native northern watermilfoil (Myriophyllum sibiricum Komarov; NWM), and EWM and hybrid genotypes can differ in their growth and herbicide response (Berger et al. 2012, 2015, Thum et al. 2012, LaRue et al. 2013, Netherland and Willey 2017, Taylor et al. 2017), prompting interest in determining which specific genotypes will respond best to specific control tactics. However, because genotypes are unable to be distinguished by morphology, distinguishing genotypes requires molecular markers.Previous studies of genetic variation in EWM, NWM, and hybrid watermilfoil have used amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) and microsatellite markers. AFLPs have been used to identify hybridization and demonstrate genetic diversity in EWM, NWM,and hybrids (Zuellig and Thum 2012, LaRue et al. 2013). AFLPs are relatively cheap, but they have limited precision to distinguish closely related genotypes from sequencing or scoring errors.
机译:管理水生植物的分类群可以表现出与其生长,影响和控制疗效相关的遗传变异。例如,Hydrilla的基因型{Hydrilla Verticillata L.F. Royle)与氟酮(Micheletal Al.2004)的敏感程度不同,因此可以使用Hydilla群的遗传筛查来预测氟酮治疗是否对水体中存在的特定基因型(Benoit和Les 2013)是有效的。 。对于大多数物种,在哪里,何时以及遗传变异对于管理决策以及结果仍然是重要的。然而,分子标记可用于量化和监测跨空间和时间的遗传变异,其具有识别感兴趣的特定基因型(例如,借用除草剂基因型)或遗传变异变化的可能性,这可能是人口水平的重要变化对管理的回应。在欧亚Watermilfoil(Myriophyllum Spicatnm L.; EWM)是美国的高度管理水生植物。 ewm与天然北方的西米毛虫(Myriophyllum sibiricum Komarov; nwm)杂交,并且EWM和杂种基因型可能因其生长和除草剂反应而异(Berger等,2012,2015,Thum等,2012,Larue等,2013,荷兰和Willey 2017,Taylor等人2017),促使兴趣确定哪些特定基因型将最佳对特定的控制策略。然而,因为基因型不能通过形态区分,所以具有分子标记需要分子标记。EWM,NWM和杂交水翅片的遗传变异的前提研究使用扩增的片段长度多态性(AFLP)和微卫星标记。 AFLP已被用于鉴定杂交,并展示EWM,NWM和杂交种中的遗传多样性(Zuellig和2012,Larue等人2013)。 AFLPS相对便宜,但它们的精确精度有限,可以区分密切相关的基因型测序或评分误差。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    JEFF PASHNICK; RYAN A. THUM;

  • 作者单位

    Graduate Student Assistant Professor Department of Plant Science and Plant Pathology. Plant Bioscience Building Montana State University P.O. Box 173150 Bozeman MT 59717;

    Graduate Student Assistant Professor Department of Plant Science and Plant Pathology. Plant Bioscience Building Montana State University P.O. Box 173150 Bozeman MT 59717;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 水生植物学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号