...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied gerontology: the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society >Do Family Proxies Get It Right? Concordance in Reports of Nursing Home Residents' Everyday Preferences
【24h】

Do Family Proxies Get It Right? Concordance in Reports of Nursing Home Residents' Everyday Preferences

机译:家庭代理吗? 在护理家庭居民日常偏好的报告中的一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Limited work has examined how well family proxies understand nursing home residents' preferences. With 85 dyads of a nursing home resident and relative, we utilize descriptive statistics and multi-level modeling to examine the concordance in reports of importance ratings of 72 everyday preferences for residents. Results reveal significant mean differences at the p < .001 level between proxies and residents on 12 of 72 preferences; yet, perfect agreement in responses is poor and only increases when dichotomizing responses into an important versus not important outcome. Multi-level modeling further indicates that dyads are discrepant on reports of the importance of growth activities for residents, with residents reporting higher levels of importance than proxies. This discrepancy is associated with residents' hearing impairment and proxies' perception of resident openness. The findings highlight not only how proxies may be able to inform care for residents in nursing homes but also where further discussions are warranted.
机译:有限的工作已经审查了家庭代理如何了解护理家庭居民的偏好。在养老院居民和亲属的85个二元,我们利用了描述性统计和多级模型,以审查了72个日常偏好对居民的重要评级报告的一致性。结果显示在72个偏好的12个代理和居民之间的P <.001水平的显着平均差异;然而,在对反应的反应中的完美协议差异较差,当反应反应变为重要的反应而不是重要的结果时。多级模型进一步表明,Dyads对居民增长活动重要性的报告差异,居民报告比代理商更高的重要性。这种差异与居民的听力障碍和对居民开放的看法有关。这些研究结果不仅突出了代理商可以在护理家庭中提供服务,而且还有进一步讨论的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号