...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied physiology >Thermoregulatory adaptations with progressive heat acclimation are predominantly evident in uncompensable, but not compensable, conditions
【24h】

Thermoregulatory adaptations with progressive heat acclimation are predominantly evident in uncompensable, but not compensable, conditions

机译:具有渐进式热量适应的热调节适应在不可易钱,但不可赔偿的情况下主要是显而易见的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study assessed whether, notwithstanding lower resting absolute core temperatures, alterations in time-dependent changes in thermoregulatory responses following partial and complete heat acclimation (HA) are only evident during uncompensable heat stress. Eight untrained individuals underwent 8 wk of aerobic training (i.e., partial HA) followed by 6 days of HA in 38 degrees C/65% relative humidity (RH) (i.e., complete HA). On separate days, esophageal temperature (T-es), arm (LSRarm), and back (LSRback) sweat rate, and whole body sweat rate (WBSR) were measured during a 45-min compensable (37 degrees C/30% RH) and 60-min uncompensable (37 degrees C/60% RH) heat stress trial pre-training (PRE-TRN), post-training (POST-TRN), and post-heat acclimation (POST-HA). For compensable heat stress trials, resting Tes was lower POST-TRN (36.74 +/- 0.27 degrees C, P < 0.05) and POST-HA (36.60 +/- 0.27 degrees C, P < 0.001) compared with PRE-TRN (36.99 +/- 0.19 degrees C); however, Delta T-es was similar in all trials (PRE-TRN:0.40 +/- 0.23 degrees C; POST-TRN: 0.42 +/- 0.20 degrees C; POST-HA:0.43 +/- 0.12 degrees C, P < 0.97). While LSRback was unaltered by HA (P < 0.94), end-exercise LSRarm was higher POST-TRN (0.70 +/- 0.14 mg.cm(-2).min(-1), P < 0.001) and POST-HA (0.75 +/- 0.16 mg.cm(-2).min(-1), P < 0.001) compared with PRE-TRN (0.61 +/- 0.15 mg.cm(-2).min(-1)). Despite matched evaporative heat balance requirements, steady-state WBSR (31st-45th min) was greater POST-TRN (12.7 +/- 1.0 g/min, P < 0.02) and POST-HA (12.9 +/- 0.8 g/min, P < 0.004), compared with PRE-TRN (11.7 +/- 0.9 g/min). For uncompensable heat stress trials, resting Tes was lower POST-TRN (36.77 +/- 0.22 degrees C, P < 0.05) and POST-HA (36.62 +/- 0.15 degrees C, P < 0.03) compared with PRE-TRN (36.86 +/- 0.24 degrees C). But Delta T-es was smaller POST-TRN (0.77 +/- 0.19 degrees C, P < 0.05) and POST-HA (0.75 +/- 0.15 degrees C, P < 0.04) compared with PRE-TRN (1.10 +/- 0.32 degrees C). LSRback and LSRarm increased with HA (P < 0.007), supporting the greater WBSR with HA (POST-TRN:14.4 +/- 2.4 g/min, P < 0.001; POST-HA: 16.8 +/- 2.8 g/min, P < 0.001) compared with PRE-TRN (12.7 +/- 3.2 g/min). In conclusion, the thermal benefits of HA are primarily evident when conditions challenge the physiological capacity to dissipate heat.
机译:本研究评估了虽然较低静息绝对核心温度,但是在不可易钱的热应力期间,部分和完全热量适应(HA)下的时间依赖性反应的变化的变化仅明显。八个未训练的个体接受了8周的有氧训练(即部分HA),然后在38℃/ 65%相对湿度(RH)中6天HA(即,完整的HA)。在单独的日子中,在45分钟可补偿期间测量食管温度(T-ES),ARM(LSRARM)和返回(LSRBACK)汗液速率和全身汗液速率(WBSR)(37摄氏度37℃/ 30%RH)和60分钟的不可千分之可解为(37摄氏度C / 60%RH)热应激试验预训练(预TRN),训练后(后TRN)和热量适应(后HA)。对于可补偿的热应激试验,休息TES较低的TRN(36.74 +/- 0.27℃,P <0.05)和HA后的(36.60 +/- 0.27℃,P <0.001)相比(36.99 +/- 0.19摄氏度);然而,所有试验中的δT-ES相似(Pre-Trn:0.40 +/- 0.23℃; trn:0.42 +/- 0.20摄氏度;后HA:0.43 +/- 0.12摄氏度,P < 0.97)。虽然LSRBack由HA(P <0.94)不置换,但结束练习LSRARM较高的TRN后(0.70 +/- 0.14 mg.cm(-2).min(-1),p <0.001)和后宫( 0.75 +/- 0.16 mg.cm(-2).min(-1),p <0.001)与预Trn(0.61 +/- 0.15 mg.cm(-2).min(-1))相比。尽管蒸发热平衡要求匹配,但稳态WBSR(31St-45分钟)更大的TRN(12.7 +/- 1.0g / min,P <0.02)和后HA(12.9 +/- 0.8g / min, P <0.004),与TRN(11.7 +/- 0.9g / min)相比。对于不可允许的热应激试验,休息TES较低的TRN(36.77 +/- 0.22℃,P <0.05)和HA后(36.62 +/- 0.15℃,P <0.03),与PRE-TRN(36.86 +/- 0.24 c)。但Delta T-ES较小的TRN(0.77 +/- 0.19摄氏度,P <0.05)和HA后(0.75 +/- 0.15摄氏度,与PRE-TRN(1.10 +/- 0.32℃)。 LSRBACK和LSRARM使用HA(P <0.007)增加,支持较大的WBSR与HA(TRN:14.4 +/- 2.4g / min,P <0.001;后HA:16.8 +/- 2.8 g / min,p <0.001)与TRN预TRN(12.7 +/- 3.2g / min)相比。总之,当条件挑战生理能力以消散热量时,HA的热益效应主要是显而易见的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号