首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging studies >Too many 'false dichotomies'? Investigating the division between ageing and disability in social care services in Ireland: A study with statutory and non-statutory organisations
【24h】

Too many 'false dichotomies'? Investigating the division between ageing and disability in social care services in Ireland: A study with statutory and non-statutory organisations

机译:太多的'虚假二分法'? 调查爱尔兰社会护理服务中老龄化与残疾的划分:与法定和非法定组织的一项研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Initiatives that bridge the fields of ageing and disability are considered critical internationally but to be limited in practice. Taking Ireland as a case, and focusing on social care, this article reports on a study investigating the separate organization of older people's and disability services as perceived by those working in policy-making, service provision and advocacy. In Ireland, as in many countries, social care is administered separately for disabled people and older people. Perceptions of those working in social care are thought to play a role in successful boundary-crossing initiatives. This study suggests that while participants often perceived the administrative and funding boundary between the fields of ageing and disability as illogical, inflexible, and not delivering person-centred care or support, the divide between the two sectors is underpinned by conceptual issues, including the lack of a concept of disability with ageing. The article argues that ways are needed of articulating what it is to experience disability in older age that are shared between older people's and disability sectors. It discusses bio-psychosocial models of disability as a means of doing so, one that avoids a return to an equation between older age and impairment, disability or decline. It concludes that more interrogation is needed of the separate philosophical underpinnings of disability and older people's sectors, argues for greater linkages between the two fields and for more exploration of social constructions of the experience of disability in later life.
机译:建立衰老和残疾领域的倡议被认为是国际的,但在实践中受到限制。本文将爱尔兰视为案例,并专注于社会关怀,关于研究政策制定,服务条款和宣传的人所知,调查一项研究的研究。在爱尔兰,与许多国家一样,社会护理分别为残疾人和老年人进行管理。对社会护理工作的人的看法被认为在成功的边界举措中发挥作用。本研究表明,虽然参与者经常被视为衰老和残疾领域之间的行政和资助边界,但不灵活,而不是提供以人为本的护理或支持,但两个部门之间的鸿沟是通过概念问题的基础,包括缺乏衰老的残疾概念。本文认为,需要阐明在老年人和残疾行业之间共享的年龄在年龄较大的较老年的方法。它讨论了生物心理社会的残疾模型作为这样做的手段,避免恢复到老年人和损伤,残疾或衰退之间的方程。结论是,需要更多的思考残疾和老年人部门的思考,以便在两种领域之间的更大联系,并更加探索后续生活中残疾经验的社会结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号