...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Aerosol Science >Glass-particle adhesion-force-distribution on clean (laboratory) and contaminated (outdoor) surfaces
【24h】

Glass-particle adhesion-force-distribution on clean (laboratory) and contaminated (outdoor) surfaces

机译:清洁(实验室)和污染(室外)表面上的玻璃粒子粘附力分布

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper explores whether laboratory-clean samples are representative of real outdoor surfaces -often covered in dust and other contaminants - with respect to adhesion properties, which ultimately affect particle resuspension. In this study, Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) was used to measure the adhesion force between a clean, smooth glass particle (5 mu m in diameter) and two glass slides, one prepared according to common laboratory practices (hereafter, clean glass) and a second one left outdoors for six weeks (hereafter, contaminated glass). It was found that the adhesion force distribution was bimodal for the clean glass while it showed three peaks for the contaminated glass. For both surfaces, the adhesion force showed a peak at very low adhesion values ( 100 nN) representing 1.2% of the measurements for the clean glass and 58% for the contaminated glass. This low-adhesion peak is important because it represents the particles that would be resuspended first even in light winds. The low adhesion-force measurements were associated with the presence of contaminants on the surface. Another notable difference between the adhesion force distributions was a long tail at high adhesion forces for clean glass (up to similar to 1900 nN) and the absence of the tail for the contaminated glass, which had a maximum adhesion force of 950 nN. The mean adhesion force on the contaminated glass was also lower than on the clean glass (206 +/- 240 nN vs. 516 +/- 354 nN). These observations indicate that the adhesion force distribution between a 5-mu m smooth and clean glass sphere and the outdoor contaminated glass surface is quite different from that of the clean glass surface. Hence, one should be cautious when using adhesion force measurements from clean surfaces to estimate particle resuspension from outdoor surfaces.
机译:本文探讨了实验室清洁样品是否代表真实的室外表面 - 覆盖灰尘和其他污染物的涂层 - 相对于粘附性能,最终影响粒子重悬浮。在该研究中,原子力显微镜(AFM)用于测量清洁,光滑的玻璃颗粒(直径5μmm)和两个玻璃载玻片之间的粘合力,根据常见的实验室实践(以下以下,清洁玻璃)和第二个左右左右六周(下文,污染的玻璃)。发现粘附力分布对于清洁玻璃的双峰,而污染玻璃呈三个峰。对于两个表面,粘附力在非常低的粘合值(≤100nn)处显示出滤色玻璃的1.2%的粘附值(≤100nn)和污染玻璃的58%的峰值。这种低粘合峰是重要的,因为它代表即使在明亮的风中也首先重新悬浮的颗粒。低粘附力测量与表面上存在污染物的存在相关。粘合力分布之间的另一个显着差异是在高粘附力的长尾部,用于清洁玻璃(最多类似于1900nn),并且污染玻璃的尾部没有尾部,其具有950nn的最大粘附力。污染玻璃上的平均粘附力也低于清洁玻璃(206 +/- 240 nn vs.516 +/- 354 nn)。这些观察结果表明,5-Mu M平滑和清洁玻璃球和室外污染的玻璃表面之间的粘合力分布与清洁玻璃表面的粘合力分布完全不同。因此,当使用清洁表面的粘合力测量时,应该是谨慎的,以估计来自室外表面的粒子重悬浮。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号