...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of abnormal psychology >ADHD Reflects Impaired Externally Directed and Enhanced Internally Directed Attention in the Immediate Free-Recall Task
【24h】

ADHD Reflects Impaired Externally Directed and Enhanced Internally Directed Attention in the Immediate Free-Recall Task

机译:ADHD反映了外部指示的障碍,并在立即自由召回任务中提高内部定向关注

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Previous attempts to understand the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may be limited by the tendency to focus exclusively on "externally directed cognition" (EDC) while ignoring "internally directed cognition" (IDC; Dixon, Fox, & Christoff, 2014. There is clear evidence that ADHD reflects deficiencies in EDC because of weaknesses in modulatory, motivational, and cognitive control constructs, but little is currently known about the integrity of IDC in ADHD. In the present study, we used a verbal episodic memory task involving immediate free recall to assess the integrity of EDC and IDC in a sample of 111 adolescents, 50 with study-confirmed diagnoses of ADHD and 61 without. The ADHD group was found to have significantly worse scores on outcomes that depend on EDC during encoding (serial position), and significantly better scores on outcomes that depend on IDC during retrieval (lag-conditional response probabilities). In addition, model parameters estimating the contribution of EDC and IDC processes were fit to these data using the retrieved context model of memory search. The model suggested that, during encoding, the ADHD group had slower mental context drift, indicative of weaker externally directed attention to the list items, as well as deficiencies in their ability to allocate and sustain attention when the study list first appeared. During retrieval, in contrast, the model suggested that the ADHD group had faster mental context drift indicative of stronger internally directed attention to retrieved context. These findings provide novel evidence that ADHD reflects impaired EDC and enhanced IDC, and they reinforce the clinical relevance of distinguishing EDC and IDC in future studies.
机译:以前试图了解注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的神经认知机制可能受到专门关注“外部定向认知”(EDC)的趋势,同时忽略“内部定向的认知”(IDC;迪克森,狐狸,&克里斯托夫,2014年。有明确的证据表明,由于调节,励志和认知控制构建构建的弱点,ADHD反映了EDC的缺陷,但目前关于ADHD IDC的完整性知之甚少。在本研究中,我们使用了一种口头集体内存任务涉及立即免费召回,以评估EDC和IDC在111名青少年的样本中的完整性,其中50名具有研究证实的ADHD和61的诊断,没有。发现ADHD组在依赖EDC期间的结果非常糟糕得多编码(串行位置),并在检索期间取决于IDC的结果(滞后条件响应概率)明显更好的分数。此外,模型使用检索到的内存搜索模型,参数估计EDC和IDC进程的贡献适合这些数据。该模型建议,在编码期间,ADHD组的精神上的情境漂移较慢,表明当研究清单首次出现时,他们对列表项目的外部引导弱点,以及缺陷,他们分配和维持注意力的能力。在检索期间,相比之下,该模型建议ADHD组的精神上的情境漂移表明更强的内部指示对检索的背景。这些调查结果提供了新的证据,即ADHD反映了EDC受损和增强的IDC,它们加强了区分EDC和IDC在未来研究中的临床相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号