首页> 外文期刊>Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology >Comparison of different combinations of maximum medical therapy for lowering intraocular pressure in primary open angle glaucoma: 12-month retrospective consecutive case series
【24h】

Comparison of different combinations of maximum medical therapy for lowering intraocular pressure in primary open angle glaucoma: 12-month retrospective consecutive case series

机译:最大医学疗法的不同组合对初级开角型青光眼的眼内压力:12个月的连续案例系列

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of two combinations of maximum medical therapy for lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).Study designA retrospective consecutive case series. MethodsA retrospective consecutive case series study including 82 eyes of 82 subjects with POAG treated with maximum medical therapy to lower IOP. Enrolled patients were divided into 2 groups: the triple maximum medical therapy (TMT) group, comprising POAG patients who were treated with tafluprost, brimonidine and the fixed drug combination (FDC) brinzolamide/timolol; and the double maximum medical therapy (DMT) group, comprising POAG patients who were treated with the FDCs tafluprost/timolol and brinzolamide/brimonidine. We compared the demographics, baseline IOP, IOP reduction rate, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) between the 2 groups.ResultsWhile the mean IOP reduction rate after 12 months was higher in the TMT group (52.7%) than in the DMT group (50.4%), the difference was not significant (p-value = 0.615). In the TMT group, the rate of proceeding to laser or surgical therapy was 22.2% (DMT group = 37.8%). In the TMT group, the time duration between beginning maximum medical therapy and proceeding to laser or surgical therapy was 10.7 1.3 months (DMT group = 10.3 +/- 1.5 months). No serious ADRs were reported in either group. However, the incidence rate of conjunctival hyperemia and dry eye was significantly lower in the DMT group than in the TMT group.Conclusion DMT is safe and effective for lowering IOP in POAG patients. DMT is not inferior to TMT in POAG patients.
机译:Purposeto比较最大医疗治疗两种组合的疗效和安全性,用于降低原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)中的眼内压(IOP)。Study Designa的连续案例系列。 MethaSA方法是回顾性的连续案例序列研究,包括82只眼睛的82名受试者,用最大的医疗治疗对降低IOP治疗。已注册的患者分为2组:三重最大医疗治疗(TMT)组,包括用Tafluprost,Brimonidine和固定药物组合(FDC)Brinzolamide / Timolol治疗的POG患者;和双重最大医疗疗法(DMT)组,包括用FDCS Tafluprost / Timolol和Brinzolamide / Brimonidine治疗的POG患者。我们将人口统计,基线IOP,IOP还原率和两组之间的不良药物反应(ADRS)进行了比较。培养基在TMT组(52.7%)高于DMT组(50.4)后12个月后的平均IOP减少率(50.4 %),差异不显着(p值= 0.615)。在TMT组中,进行激光或外科治疗的速率为22.2%(DMT组= 37.8%)。在TMT组中,开始最大医疗疗法与激光或外科治疗之间的时间持续时间为10.7 1.3个月(DMT组= 10.3 +/- 1.5个月)。任何一组都没有报告严重的ADR。然而,DMT组结膜充血和干眼症的发病率明显低于TMT组。结论DMT对于降低POG患者的IOP是安全的,有效的。 DMT在POG患者中不逊于TMT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号