首页> 外文期刊>World Development >Institutional bindingness, power structure, and land expropriation in China
【24h】

Institutional bindingness, power structure, and land expropriation in China

机译:制度结合,力量结构和土地征收在中国

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The prevailing argument that quasi-democratic institutions in authoritarian regimes improve governance outcomes hinges on the presumption that institutions empower non-state actors and constrain the discretionary power of ruling elites a concept we call "institutional bindingness." However, institutions are not always binding, and the degree of institutional bindingness varies across contexts. This article examines the bindingness of village elections in China. Through the lens of land expropriation in pe-urban villages and using survey data, we find that institutional bindingness operationalized in terms of the power structure within village leadership strongly shapes the processes and outcomes of land expropriations and therefore the quality of village governance. Moreover, village power structure depends on political bargaining between ordinary villagers and local states. Our findings contribute to the understanding of quasi-democratic institutions in authoritarian regimes by explicitly examining how institutional bindingness affects governance outcomes and how bindingness is endogenously determined. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:普遍的论证:准民主机构在威权制度中改善了治理结果对制度赋予非国家行为者的推定,并限制了统治精英的自由裁定力量我们称之为“制度结合”的概念。但是,机构并不总是具有约束力,体制性结合程度在背景下变化。本文探讨了中国村选举的结合。通过PE城市村庄的土地征收镜片和使用调查数据,我们发现在村庄领导层内的电力结构方面运作的制度结合强烈地塑造了土地征用的过程和结果,从而养殖村治理的质量。此外,村力结构取决于普通村民和地方国之间的政治谈判。我们的调查结果通过明确研究制度结合如何影响治理结果以及内源性内源性的如何确定如何确定,对威权主义制度有助于了解准民主机构。 (c)2018年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号