首页> 外文期刊>World Development >Power tariffs for groundwater irrigation in India: A comparative analysis of the environmental, equity, and economic tradeoffs
【24h】

Power tariffs for groundwater irrigation in India: A comparative analysis of the environmental, equity, and economic tradeoffs

机译:印度地下水灌溉的权力关税:环境,股权和经济权衡的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Groundwater irrigation using electric pumps plays a key role in India's agricultural water supply. Power utilities across different states use two common tariff modes to charge groundwater consumers: flat tariffs, where payments are fixed according to a pump's power rating, and metered tariffs based on units of power actually consumed. In this review, we use empirical evidence from past studies across multiple jurisdictions in India to compare the two tariff structures in terms of three key features: administrative burden on utilities: equity of groundwater access between high-income and low-income farmers; and influence on farmers' pumping behavior. Our analysis shows that flat tariffs have low administrative costs and more equitable distributional outcomes, but provide no incentive to farmers for water conservation. Conversely, metered tariffs have the potential to encourage judicious consumption, but are expensive to manage and disadvantageous to low-income farmers who often buy water from wealthier groundwater well owners. Flawed tariff policies, in conjunction with large subsidies for agricultural power, have caused rapid groundwater depletion in many regions as well as massive financial losses to power utilities and governments - both state and central. Since there is considerable heterogeneity in agricultural practices and groundwater availability across India, we propose location-specific strategies for rationalizing agricultural power tariffs in different regions. While the groundwater-abundant eastern regions can benefit from a hybrid flat-cum-metered tariff that encourages farmer-to-farmer water sales, western states facing unsustainable groundwater exploitation should develop tariff policies that ration power, prioritize its supply during the most critical seasons, and reward farmers who reduce their groundwater consumption. Not only will such tariff policies help conserve groundwater, but also augment government financial resources for social welfare programs such as education, health, energy access etc. Thus, improved power policies can provide substantial assistance in India's progress towards multiple UN Sustainable Development Goals. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:采用电动泵的地下水灌溉在印度的农用供水中起着关键作用。不同状态的电力公用事业使用两种常见的关税模式来充电地下水消费者:平面关税,根据泵的额定功率固定支付,以及基于实际消耗的电力单位的计量关税。在这篇综述中,我们使用在印度的多个司法管辖区的过去研究中使用经验证据,以比较三个关键特征:公用事业管理负担:高收入和低收入农民之间的地下水进入的权益;对农民泵送行为的影响。我们的分析表明,扁平关税具有低的行政费用和更公平的分配结果,但为农民提供了不提供水资源的奖励。相反,计量关税有可能鼓励明智的消费,但对经常从富裕的地下水业主购买水的低收入农民来管理和不利昂的昂贵。缺陷的关税政策与农业大国的大量补贴,在许多地区造成了快速的地下水耗尽,以及巨大的经济损失到电力公用事业和政府 - 两个国家和中央。由于在印度的农业实践和地下水可用性方面存在相当大的异质性,我们提出了特定于不同地区农业电力关税的特定程度的策略。虽然地下水丰富的东部地区可以受益于鼓励农民到农贸销售的混合型互相金额关税,但西方国家面临不可持续的地下水开采应制定出售权力的关税政策,在最关键的季节期间优先顺序供应。 ,并奖励减少地下水消费的农民。此类关税政策不仅有助于保护地下水,还增加了教育,卫生,能源进入等社会福利方案的政府财政资源,因此,改善的权力政策可以在印度对多元联合国可持续发展目标的进步提供大量援助。 (c)2019年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号