首页> 外文期刊>World Development >Redefining the social contract in the wake of the Arab Spring: The experiences of Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia
【24h】

Redefining the social contract in the wake of the Arab Spring: The experiences of Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia

机译:在阿拉伯春天重新定义社会契约:埃及,摩洛哥和突尼斯的经历

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The social contract is the deal between the state and its citizens by which the latter agree the rule of the former in return for deliverables Over time, the state's deliverables have evolved from simple law and order to a set of social rights, such as the social contract in North African countries like Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia -in the 1950s and 1960s. State-led development, including state-led industrial development, provided jobs to many, with state provision of health and education and a range of consumer subsidies. Deteriorating economic performance led to the collapse of this model as the state could no longer provide these deliverables. Instead, an 'unsocial' social contract emerged under liberalisation in which the state used trade, industrial and other economic policies to favour an emerging group of crony capitalists who in turn provided support for the regime. The growing inequality and diminishing benefits for the masses undermined its sustainability resulting in the Arab Spring. The trajectory of the social contract has differed in the three countries. In Egypt, the 'unsocial' social contract is further entrenched. The army is taking the role of a leading business-group using industrial policy to political ends. Its strong engagement in the economy makes it an interested party rather than an impartial arbiter. In Morocco, the King still retains a prime position but has accommodated some pressures for a more inclusive industrial policy in domestic markets, which may lay the basis for a more broadly based social contract. Tunisia is finding its way to an even more inclusive development model, but is still struggling for consensus for a clear economic policy direction and remains threatened by extremist elements. International efforts to support democratic development in these countries need to be conditioned on the differing nature of the ongoing transitions in the social contract. (C) 2019 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:社会契约是国家及其公民之间的交易,后者同意前者的规则随着时间的推移,该州的可交付成果从简单的法律中发展,并向一系列社会权利,如社会20世纪50年代和20世纪60年代,在北非,摩洛哥和突尼斯等北非国家合同。国家主导的发展,包括国家主导的工业发展,为许多人提供了许多工作,具有国家提供健康和教育以及一系列消费者补贴。恶化的经济性能导致该模型的崩溃,因为国家不能再提供这些可交付成果。相反,在自由化下出现了“非社会”社会合同,其中国家使用的贸易,工业和其他经济政策是赞成新兴的荣誉资本家集团,他们反过来为该制度提供了支持。群众的不平等不平等和递减效益不断突破其可持续性导致阿拉伯春季。社会合同的轨迹在三个国家有所不同。在埃及,“非社会”社会合同进一步根深蒂固。陆军正在利用一个领先的业务集团使用产业政策对政治目的的作用。它在经济的强烈参与使其成为一个有兴趣的党而不是公正的仲裁者。在摩洛哥,国王仍然保留了一个奖金,但在国内市场中提供了更多包容性产业政策的一些压力,这可能为更广泛的社会合同奠定了基础。突尼斯正在寻找进入更具包容性发展模式的方式,但仍然努力为明确的经济政策方向达成共识,并留下极端主义元素的威胁。支持这些国家的民主发展的国际努力需要在社会合同中持续过渡的不同性质。 (c)2019年作者。 elsevier有限公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号