...
首页> 外文期刊>Dysphagia >Inter-rater Reliability of the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS): Effects of Clinical Experience, Audio-Recording and Training
【24h】

Inter-rater Reliability of the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS): Effects of Clinical Experience, Audio-Recording and Training

机译:吞咽困难结果和严重程度(DOSS)的帧间间可靠性:临床经验,音频记录和培训的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) is widely used to measure dysphagia severity based on videofluoroscopy (VFSS). This study investigated inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the DOSS. It also determined the effect of clinical experience, VFSS audio-recording and training on DOSS IRR. A quantitative prospective research design was used. Seventeen speech and language pathologists (SLPs) were recruited from an acute teaching hospital, Dublin ( 3 years' VFSS experience, n = 10) and from a postgraduate dysphagia programme in a university setting ( 3 years' VFSS experience; n = 7). During testing, participants viewed eight VFSS clips (5 with audio-recording). Each VFSS clip was independently rated using the DOSS scale. Four weeks later, the less experienced group attended a 1-h training session on DOSS rating after which DOSS IRR was re-tested. Cohen's kappa co-efficient was used to establish IRR. IRR of the DOSS presented only fair agreement (kappa = 0.36, p 0.05). DOSS IRR was significantly higher (kappa = 0.342) within the more experienced SLP group, compared to the less experienced SLP group (kappa = 0.298) (p 0.05). DOSS IRR was significantly higher in VFSS clips with audio-recording (kappa = 0.287) compared to VFSS clips without audio-recording (kappa = - 0.0395) (p 0.05). IRR of the DOSS pre-training (kappa = 0.328) was significantly better comparing to post-training (kappa = 0.218) (p 0.05). Findings raise concerns as the DOSS is frequently used in clinical practice to capture dysphagia severity and to monitor changes.
机译:吞咽困难结果和严重程度(DOSS)被广泛用于根据Videof荧光检查(VFS)来测量吞咽困难严重程度。本研究调查了DOSS的互补者可靠性(IRR)。它还确定了临床经验的影响,VFSS音频记录和DOSS IRR的训练。使用定量预期研究设计。从都柏林的急性教学医院招募了十七语言和语言病理学家(SLP)(& 3年的VFSS经验,N = 10),并从大学环境中的研究生吞咽型计划(& 3年的vfss体验; n = 7)。在测试期间,参与者查看了八个VFSS剪辑(5个带音频录制)。每个VFSS剪辑都是使用DOSS比例独立评定的。四周后,经验丰富的群体在重新测试过Doss Rant后,少女培训课程参加了1-H培训课程。科恩的Kappa共同效率用于建立IRR。 DOSS的IRR只有公平的协议(Kappa = 0.36,P <0.05)。与经验不太有效的SLP组(Kappa = 0.298)(P <0.05)相比,DOSS IRR在更经验的SLP组内显着更高(Kappa = 0.342)。与VFSS剪辑相比,VFSS剪辑中的VFSS剪辑中的VFSS IRH在没有音频记录的VFSS剪辑(KAPPA = - 0.0395)(P <0.05)中,DOSS IRR在VFSS剪辑中显着更高。 DOSS预训练(Kappa = 0.328)的IRR可以显着比较训练后(Kappa = 0.218)(P <0.05)。调查结果提高了损伤的担忧,通常用于临床实践以捕获吞咽困难严重程度并监测变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号