首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions >Safety of contemporary percutaneous peripheral arterial interventions in the elderly insights from the BMC2 PVI (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium Peripheral Vascular Intervention) registry.
【24h】

Safety of contemporary percutaneous peripheral arterial interventions in the elderly insights from the BMC2 PVI (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium Peripheral Vascular Intervention) registry.

机译:BMC2 PVI老人洞察中当代经皮外周动脉干预的安全性(密歇根心血管联盟外周血管干预的蓝桥蓝盾)登记。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the effect of age on procedure type, periprocedural management, and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing lower-extremity (LE) peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). BACKGROUND: Surgical therapy of peripheral arterial disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the elderly. There are limited data related to the influence of advanced age on the outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous LE PVI. METHODS: Clinical presentation, comorbidities, and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing LE PVI in a multicenter, multidisciplinary registry were compared between 3 age groups: < 70 years, between 70 and 80 years, and >/= 80 years (elderly group). RESULTS: In our cohort, 7,769 patients underwent LE PVI. The elderly patients were more likely to be female and to have a greater burden of comorbidities. Procedural success was lower in the elderly group (74.2% for age >/= 80 years vs. 78% for age 70 to < 80 years and 81.4% in patients age < 70 years, respectively; p < 0.0001). Unadjusted rates of procedure-related vascular access complications, post-procedure transfusion, contrast-induced nephropathy, amputation, and major adverse cardiac events were higher in elderly patients. After adjustment for baseline covariates, the elderly patients were more likely to experience vascular access complications; however, advanced age was not found to be associated with major adverse cardiac events, transfusion, contrast-induced nephropathy, or amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary PVI can be performed in elderly patients with high procedural and technical success with low rates of periprocedural complications including mortality. These findings may support the notion of using PVI as a preferred revascularization strategy in the treatment of severe peripheral arterial disease in the elderly population.
机译:目的:本研究试图评估患有下肢(LE)外周血管干预(PVI)患者的程序类型,围教力管理和医院内外结果的效果。背景:外周动脉疾病的外科治疗与老年人的发病率和死亡率有关。有限的数据有关高龄患者对经皮Le PVI患者结果的影响有关的有限数据。方法:在多中心,多学科登记处进行临床介绍,疗效和医院治疗患者的患者,3年龄组:<70年,70岁,70岁,和> / = 80年(老年人) 。结果:在我们的队列中,7,769名患者接受了Le PVI。老年患者更有可能是女性,并具有更大的合并负担。年龄组的程序成功较低(年龄74.2%> / = 80岁,70岁至78%,分别为80岁至<80岁,分别为81.4%,分别为81.4%; P <0.0001)。在老年患者中,未经调入的程序相关血管接入并发症,程序后输血,对比引起的肾病,截肢和主要不良心脏事件均高。调整基线协变量后,老年患者更有可能经历血管接入并发症;然而,未发现高龄衰龄与主要不良心脏事件,输血,对比引起的肾病或截肢有关。结论:当代PVI可以在高级程序和技术成功的老年患者中进行,具有死亡率,包括死亡率,包括死亡率的低率。这些发现可以支持使用PVI作为优选的血运重建策略,治疗老年人的严重外周血动脉疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号