...
首页> 外文期刊>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions >Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio for?the?Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients With?Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis
【24h】

Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio for?the?Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients With?Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

机译:瞬时波的比率?该患者中中间冠状动脉狭窄的评估?严重主动脉瓣狭窄

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ObjectivesThis study investigated the diagnostic performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS). BackgroundThe iFR was introduced as a new, nonpharmacologic stress index of coronary stenosis severity. However, the diagnostic performance of iFR has not been sufficiently explored in patients with severe AS. MethodsWe analyzed 95 consecutive patients with AS (57 women) demonstrating intermediate coronary artery stenosis (116 vessels), and compared the iFR values with fractional flow reserve (FFR) values and with adenosine-stress myocardial perfusion imaging as indicators of myocardial ischemia. ResultsThe median value and interquartile range (first quartile [Q1], third quartile [Q3]) of the iFR was 0.86 (Q1 to Q3 range, 0.76 to 0.93), and that of the FFR was 0.84 (Q1 to Q3 range, 0.76 to 0.91). The iFR values correlated well with the FFR values (R?= 0.854; p?< 0.0001). A receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated an optimal cutoff of 0.82 for the iFR to indicate an FFR?≤0.75, with an area under the curve of 0.92. The optimal iFR cutoff value indicating myocardial ischemia on perfusion scintigraphy was 0.82 (area under the curve: 0.84). ConclusionsIn patients with severe AS, a good correlation exists between iFR and FFR. Both the iFR and FFR values exhibit good correlation with perfusion scintigraphy–identified myocardial ischemia. The iFR could be a safe diagnostic tool for patients with severe AS. (The Impact of FFR and iFR in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis;UMIN000024479).
机译:客观研究研究了主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者瞬时波动比(IFR)的诊断性能。背景技术IFR被引入冠状动脉狭窄严重程度的新的非武渣应激指数。然而,IFR的诊断性能尚未充分探索严重的患者。方法网络分析了95名连续95名患有(57名妇女)的患者,证明中间冠状动脉狭窄(116艘血管),并将IFR值与分数流量储备(FFR)值进行比较,并且腺苷 - 应激心肌灌注成像作为心肌缺血指标。 IFR的中值和间隙范围(IFR的第一个四分位数(第一四分位数[Q1],第三四分位[Q3])为0.86(Q1至Q3范围,0.76至0.93),FFR为0.84(Q1至Q3范围,0.76至0.76 0.91)。 IFR值与FFR值相密(R?= 0.854; p?<0.0001)。接收器操作特性分析证明了IFR的最佳截止值为0.82,以指示FFR?≤0.75,曲线下的区域为0.92。表明灌注闪烁上的心肌缺血的最佳IFR截止值为0.82(曲线下的面积:0.84)。结论ISIONSION患者,IFR和FFR之间存在良好的相关性。 IFR和FFR值都表现出与灌注闪烁鉴定的心肌缺血良好相关性。 IFR可能是严重患者的安全诊断工具。 (FFR和IFR对严重主动脉狭窄患者的影响; UMIN000024479)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号