首页> 外文期刊>Drug safety: An international journal of medical toxicology and drug experience >Coronary Events After Dispensing of Ibuprofen: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Versus Paracetamol in the French Nationwide Claims Database Sample
【24h】

Coronary Events After Dispensing of Ibuprofen: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Versus Paracetamol in the French Nationwide Claims Database Sample

机译:冠状动脉事件在布洛芬分配后:法国全国索赔数据库样本中的促进分数匹配队列与扑热息痛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IntroductionNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with a dose and duration-dependent coronary risk. There is little information concerning analgesic-dose ibuprofen, among the most widely used drugs worldwide.ObjectiveOur objective was to measure the risks of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after dispensing of ibuprofen, versus paracetamol.MethodsPropensity score 1:2-matched cohorts of ibuprofen or paracetamol treatment episodes (TEs) in Echantillon Generaliste de Beneficiaires (EGB), the 1/97 sample of Systeme National des Donnees de Sante (SNDS), the French nationwide claims database, from 2009 to 2014, were compared. Outcomes were hospital admissions for ACS during the 3months after the dispensing of ibuprofen or paracetamol. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated overall and stratified on low-dose aspirin dispensing.ResultsA total of 315,269 ibuprofen TEs in 168,400 persons were matched to 630,457 paracetamol TEs in 395,952 patients. Event rates were 50-100 times higher in low-dose aspirin users (27 vs 0.28 per 1000 patient years). Overall there was no difference in risk of ACS at 3months (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.20) despite a transient increase in the first 2weeks in ibuprofen users (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.11-2.59). In the stratified analysis, this short-term risk was only found in aspirin users (5% of population, HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.24-3.24), but not in non-aspirin users (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.40-2.94).ConclusionsThere was no evidence for an increased risk of ACS in patients dispensed ibuprofen compared to paracetamol.
机译:引言 - 甾体抗炎药与剂量和持续时间依赖性冠状动脉风险有关。关于镇痛剂量的镇痛剂量的信息,在全球最广泛使用的药物中。波模糊的目的是衡量急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的风险,在水脯芬分配后,与扑热息痛。方法1:2匹配的布洛芬队列或者在2009年至2014年,从2009年到2014年,Echantillon通用De Boysires(EGB)中的索兰替尔顿通用De受益者(EGB)中的1/97个Systee Des DeNees de Sante(SNDS),从2009年到2014年。在分配布洛芬或扑热息醇后,3个月期间,结果是ACS的医院入院。危险比率(HRS)和95%置信区间(CIS)总体上计算并在低剂量阿司匹林分配上分层。培养315,269中的315,269人在395,952名患者中匹配了630,457甲基酰胺TES。低剂量阿司匹林用户的事件率较高50-100倍(每1000例患者年为每年27.28)。总体而言,除了布洛芬用户的前2周(HR 1.70,95%CI 1.11-2.59)中,3个月(HR 0.94,95%CI 0.74-1.20),ACS的风险没有差异(HR 0.94,95%CI 0.74-1.20)。在分层分析中,这种短期风险仅在阿司匹林用户(5%的人口,HR 1.84,95%CI 1.24-3.24)中发现,但不含非阿司匹林用户(HR 1.09,95%CI 0.40-2.94 )。结论,与扑热息痛相比,患者中ACS的风险增加没有证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号