首页> 外文期刊>Digestive endoscopy: official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society >Hybrid procedure combining endoscopic gallbladder lavage and internal drainage with elective cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: A prospective pilot study (The BLADE BLADE study)
【24h】

Hybrid procedure combining endoscopic gallbladder lavage and internal drainage with elective cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: A prospective pilot study (The BLADE BLADE study)

机译:混合过程结合内镜胆囊灌洗和内部排水,随着急性胆囊炎的选择性胆囊切除术:一项预期试验研究(刀片刀片研究)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background and Aim Percutaneous transhepatic drainage is the most common method for non‐operative gallbladder drainage, but the technique does have several disadvantages because of its invasive nature and requirement for continuous drainage. To overcome these disadvantages, we developed a novel procedure, endoscopic gallbladder lavage followed by stent placement, carried out in a single endoscopic session. Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure in patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods Patients diagnosed with moderate cholecystitis at four tertiary care centers were enrolled in this study. We initially placed a 5‐Fr tube to carry out gallbladder lavage. The tube was then cut to the optimal length and placed as a stent. Main outcomes were procedural and clinical success rates. Results The procedure was attempted in 40 patients and was successful in 30 (75.0%). Minor adverse events occurred in two (5.0%) patients: perforation of the cystic duct by the guidewire in one patient and pancreatitis in the other. Among the 30 patients in whom the procedure was successfully done, clinical resolution was obtained in 29 (96.6%). Elective cholecystectomy was carried out in 37 patients (92.5%), with a median delay after drainage of 42?days (range, 12–138?days). There were no adverse events during the waiting period. Conclusions Gallbladder rinsing followed by internal drainage using a 5‐Fr nasobiliary tube is considered an effective and safe alternative to other techniques, providing an acceptable success rate in patients with acute cholecystitis prior to elective surgery. Clinical trial information: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm (ID: UMIN‐000009680).
机译:背景和瞄准经皮胸腔引流是非操作性胆囊引流的最常见方法,但由于其侵入性,并且对连续排水的要求,该技术确实具有若干缺点。为了克服这些缺点,我们开发了一种新的程序,内窥镜胆囊灌洗,然后进行支架放置,在单一内窥镜会议中进行。我们的目的是潜在急性胆囊炎患者此程序的疗效和安全性。方法在本研究中注册了四个第三位护理中心诊断患有中等胆囊炎的患者。我们最初放置了一个5-FR管以进行胆囊灌洗。然后将管切割成最佳长度并作为支架置于支架。主要结果是程序和临床成功率。结果在40名患者中尝试了该程序,成功30名(75.0%)。次要不良事件发生在两次(5.0%)患者中发生:在一个患者的导丝和另一名患者的导丝穿孔和胰腺炎。在成功完成该程序的30名患者中,29例(96.6%)获得临床分辨率。在37名患者(92.5%)中进行了选修胆囊切除术,排水后的中位延迟(范围,12-138天)。在等待期间没有不良事件。结论胆囊漂洗随后使用5-FR鼻管的内部排水被认为是对其他技术的有效且安全的替代品,为选修外科患者提供了急性胆囊炎患者的可接受的成功率。临床试验信息:http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm(ID:Umin-000009680)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号