首页> 外文期刊>Digestive endoscopy: official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society >Clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gallbladder drainage replacement of percutaneous drainage: A multicenter retrospective study
【24h】

Clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gallbladder drainage replacement of percutaneous drainage: A multicenter retrospective study

机译:内镜超声引导胆囊引流置换经皮排水的临床疗效和安全性:多中心回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage ( PTGBD ) is widely used for patients with acute cholecystitis. There are little data on the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided gallbladder drainage ( EUS ‐ GBD ) replacement of PTGBD in patients who cannot undergo cholecystectomy. Methods This multicenter retrospective study in Japan reviewed records of patients who underwent EUS ‐ GBD to replace PTGBD between January 2010 and December 2017. Outcomes evaluated included technical success, defined as successful stent placement between the gastrointestinal lumen and the gallbladder; clinical success, defined as subsequent removal of the percutaneous catheter; adverse events; and stent patency. Results EUS ‐ GBD was performed in 21 patients (14 women, mean age 77.5 ± 8.0 years) to replace PTGBD that had been instituted for acute cholecystitis ( n = 19) or obstructive jaundice ( n = 2). Technical success was achieved in 19 (90.5%). The median period from PTGBD placement to EUS ‐ GBD was 11 days (range, 6–68 days). The mean procedure time was 19.5 ± 5.1 min. No early adverse events were observed. There were three late adverse events, distal stent migration in two cases and stent occlusion causing recurrent cholecystitis in one patient. Reintervention was required in two patients. The percutaneous catheter was removed after EUS ‐ GBD in 17 patients at a median of 7 days (range, 2–20 days). The duration of stent patency was 139 days (range, 8–664 days). Conclusions Where ongoing gallbladder drainage is required, conversion from PTGBD to EUS ‐ GBD is a feasible, effective, and safe technique for patients who cannot undergo cholecystectomy.
机译:目的经皮胸腔胆囊引流(PTGBD)广泛用于急性胆囊炎的患者。关于内镜超声引导的胆囊引流(EUS - GBD)替代PTGBD的疗效和安全性的几乎没有数据。方法对日本的多中心回顾性研究审查了EUS - GBD的患者记录,以取代2010年1月至2017年12月。评估的结果包括技术成功,定义为胃肠腔和胆囊之间的成功支架。临床成功,定义为后续去除经皮导管;不良事件;和支架的通畅。结果EUS - GBD在21例(14名女性,平均值77.5±8.0年)中进行,以取代已经为急性胆囊炎(n = 19)或阻塞性黄疸(n = 2)制定的PTGBD。技术成功成功19(90.5%)。从PTGBD安置到EUS - GBD的中位数为11天(范围,6-68天)。平均程序时间为19.5±5.1分钟。没有观察到早期不良事件。两种病例中有三种晚期不良事件,远端支架迁移和支架闭塞导致一名患者的复发性胆囊炎。两名患者需要重新营养。在17例患者中位于7天(范围,2-20天)后17例患者中除去经皮导管。支架通畅的持续时间为139天(范围,8-664天)。结论需要持续的胆囊引流,从PTGBD转化为EUS - GBD是一种可行,有效,安全的患者,用于无法接受胆囊切除术的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号