...
首页> 外文期刊>Digestive Diseases and Sciences >Performance of Platelet Count/Spleen Diameter Ratio for Diagnosis of Esophageal Varices in Cirrhosis: A Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Performance of Platelet Count/Spleen Diameter Ratio for Diagnosis of Esophageal Varices in Cirrhosis: A Meta-Analysis

机译:血小板计数/脾脏直径比肝硬化中食管静脉曲化的血液直径比率:META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio (PSR) is a non-invasive method for the assessment of esophageal varices (EV), developed as an alternative to endoscopy. Aim To assess the performance of PSR for diagnosis of EV using meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ISI web of Knowledge, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and article references were searched. We included studies using endoscopy as a reference standard, with the data necessary to calculate the true and false positive, true and false negative diagnostic results of PSR for EV. The quality of the studies was rated with the QUADAS tool. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) was used to examine the PSR accuracy for the diagnosis of EV. Heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression. Clinical utility of PSR for EV was evaluated by a Fagan plot. Results In 20 studies (re = 3,063), the HSROC of the PSR for EV was 0.95 at various thresholds. At the threshold of 909, the summary sensitivities and specificities were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.79-0.97) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.76-0.93), respectively. The HSROC was also 0.95 at the threshold of 909. If PSR was below 909 for EV ("positive" result), the post-test probability (if pre-test probability was 50%) was 87%, while if PSR was at or over 909 ("negative" result), the post-test probability was only 9%. PSR also had a high accuracy in diagnosis of EV in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Conclusions PSR can identify EV in cirrhosis with a high accuracy. Application of this index may decrease the need for endoscopy among cirrhotic patients.
机译:背景技术血小板计数/脾直径比(PSR)是用于评估食管静脉曲张(EV)的非侵入性方法,作为内窥镜检查的替代。目的评估PSR的性能,用于使用META分析诊断EV的诊断。方法搜索了PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,ISI网络,中国国家知识基础设施和文章参考。我们包括使用内窥镜检查作为参考标准的研究,其中数据需要计算PSR的真假正,真实和假诊断结果。研究质量与Quadas工具评定。分层摘要接收器操作特征(HSROC)用于检查EV诊断的PSR精度。使用荟萃回归探讨了异质性。 PSR对EV的临床效用由Fagan Plot评估。结果在20项研究(RE = 3,063)中,PSR的HSROC在各种阈值下为EV为0.95。在909的阈值下,摘要敏感性和特异性分别为0.92(95%CI,0.79-0.97)和0.87(95%CI,0.76-0.93)。 HSROC在909的阈值下也是0.95.如果PSR低于909的EV(“阳性”结果),则测试后概率(如果预测试概率为50%)为87%,而如果PSR在或超过909(“否定”结果),后测试概率仅为9%。 PSR在补偿肝硬化患者患者中也具有高精度。结论PSR可以高精度地识别肝硬化中的EV。本指数的应用可能会降低肝硬化患者对内窥镜检查的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号