...
首页> 外文期刊>Diseases of the esophagus: official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus >Liquid Nitrogen Spray Cryotherapy in Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus, where do we stand? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Liquid Nitrogen Spray Cryotherapy in Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus, where do we stand? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:液氮喷雾冷冻疗法治疗巴雷特食管,我们站在哪里? 系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the preferred treatment option for Barrett's esophagus (BE) to achieve complete eradication (CE) of dysplasia (D), and intestinal metaplasia (IM). Cryotherapy, using liquid nitrogen (LNC), is a cold-induced tissue-injury technique option for the ablation of BE. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the overall efficacy and safety of LNC in the treatment of BE. We conducted a search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings from inception through June 2018. The primary outcome was to estimate the pooled rates of CE-IM, CE-D, and CE-HGD. The secondary outcome was to estimate the risk of adverse events and recurrence of disease after LNC. Nine studies reported 386 patients who were treated with LNC. The pooled rate of CE-IM was 56.5% (95% CI 48.5-64.2, I-2=47), pooled rate of CE-D was 83.5% (95% CI 78.3-87.7, I-2=22.8), and pooled rate of CE-HGD was 86.5% (95% CI 64.4-95.8, I-2=88.1). Rate of adverse events was 4.7%, and the risk of BE recurrence was 12.7%. On subgroup analysis, the pooled rate of CE-IM with LNC in patients who failed RFA was 58.4% (95% CI 47.2-68.8, I-2=32.5), and the pooled rate of CE-D in the same population was 81.9% (95% CI 72.5-88.6, I-2=5.9). CE-D rates with LNC are comparable to RFA while CE-IM rates appear to be lower than the rates achievable with RFA. CE-IM rate in RFA failed patients is 58.4% and thus LNC is a rescue option to consider in this population.
机译:射频消融(RFA)是Barrett食管(BE)的首选治疗选项,以实现发育不良(D)的完全根除(CE)和肠道胰岛素(IM)。使用液氮(LNC)的冷冻疗法是一种冷致诱导的组织损伤技术选择,用于消融是。我们进行了系统审查和荟萃分析,以评估LNC在治疗中的整体疗效和安全性。我们通过2018年6月来搜索了多个电子数据库和会议程序。主要结果是估计CE-IM,CE-D和CE-HGD的汇总率。二次结果是估计LNC后疾病不良事件和复发的风险。 9项研究报告了386名患者被LNC治疗。 CE-IM的汇集率为56.5%(95%CI 48.5-64.2,I-2 = 47),CE-D的合并率为83.5%(95%CI 78.3-87.7,I-2 = 22.8),和CE-HGD的汇集率为86.5%(95%CI 64.4-95.8,I-2 = 88.1)。不良事件的速率为4.7%,并且复发的风险为12.7%。在亚组分析中,RFA失败的患者的CE-IM与LNC的汇总率为58.4%(95%CI 47.2-68.8,I-2 = 32.5),同一人群中的CE-D汇总率为81.9 %(95%CI 72.5-88.6,I-2 = 5.9)。与LNC的CE-D速率与RFA相当,而CE-IM率似乎低于RFA可实现的率。 RFA失败患者的CE-IM率为58.4%,因此LNC是在本群体中考虑的救援方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号