首页> 外文期刊>Diseases of the Colon and Rectum >Drainage Seton Versus External Anal Sphincter-Sparing Seton After Rerouting of the Fistula Tract in the Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Drainage Seton Versus External Anal Sphincter-Sparing Seton After Rerouting of the Fistula Tract in the Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:排水套装与外部肛门括约肌备件塞塞在重新调节瘘管中的肛门瘘:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

RESULTS: Sixty patients (56 men) with a mean age of 43 years were included. Mean operation time in group 1 was significantly shorter than group 2 (29.8 +/- 4.3 vs 43.8 +/- 4.5 min; p < 0.0001). The mean pain score at 24 hours in group 1 was 8.1 +/- 1.6 versus 5.3 +/- 1.3 in group 2 (p < 0.0001). Five patients (17%) in group 1 experienced complications versus 2 (7%) in group 2. All of the patients in group 1 required a second-stage fistulotomy versus 2 patients (7%) in group 2 (p < 0.0001). Time to complete healing in group 1 was significantly (p < 0.0001) longer than group 2 (103 +/- 47 vs 46 +/- 18 d). Four patients (13%) in group 1 and 1 patient (3%) in group 2 experienced persistence or recurrence of anal fistula (p = 0.35).
机译:结果:六十名患者(56名男子)包括平均43岁。 第1组的平均手术时间明显短于2组(29.8 +/- 4.3 Vs 43.8 +/- 4.5分钟; P <0.0001)。 第1组24小时的平均疼痛评分为8.1 +/- 1.6,第2组中的5.3 +/- 1.3(P <0.0001)。 第1组中的五名患者(17%)经历了第2组中的并发症与2(7%)(7%)。第1组的所有患者都需要第二阶段瘘管与2组(7%)(P <0.0001)。 在第1组中完成愈合的时间显着(p <0.0001)比第2组长(103 +/- 47 Vs 46 +/- 18d)。 第1组和第1组患者(13%)的患者(3%)在2组中经历了肛门瘘的持续或复发(P = 0.35)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号