...
首页> 外文期刊>Developmental psychology >Promoting Child Development Through Group-Based Parent Support Within a Cash Transfer Program: Experimental Effects on Children's Outcomes
【24h】

Promoting Child Development Through Group-Based Parent Support Within a Cash Transfer Program: Experimental Effects on Children's Outcomes

机译:通过基于集团的父母支持促进儿童发展:对儿童成果的实验影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We examined effects on child development of a group-based parenting support program (Educacion Inicial -EI) when combined with Mexico's conditional cash transfer (CCT) program (Prospera, originally Oportunidades and Progresa). This cluster-randomized trial included 204 communities (n = 1,113 children in final sample), stratified by community indigenous status, and assigned to receive either: (T-0) CCT only; (T-1) CCT plus availability of EI in the community; or (T-2) T-1 plus promotion of the EI program by the CCT program. Interviews were conducted with the mother or primary caregiver of each child at baseline (2008, children 0-18 months old), and at follow-up (2012, children 3-5 years old); the intervention began after baseline and continued for all eligible households. Cognitive development was assessed with the Extended Ages and Stages Questionnaire (baseline) and the McCarthy Scales of Children's Development (follow-up); assessors were blinded to treatment. All analyses were intention to treat. There were significant effects on child development when EI received support and promotion from the CCT program (T-2 vs. T-0: General Cognitive Index, beta = 3.90; 95% CI [0.51, 7.30], Verbal Score, beta = 4.28; 95% CI [0.51, 8.05], and Memory Score, beta = 4.14; 95% CI [0.62, 7.66]), effects equivalent to 0.26-0.29 SD. There were no significant benefits when the programs operated independently (T-1 vs. T-0). In stratified analyses, EI showed significant effects in indigenous communities only. We found consistent results in regressions controlling for covariates, with some reductions in magnitude of differences. Our findings suggest that group-based, parenting support programs can improve child outcomes within the context of a CCT, but only when the 2 programs are integrated and mutually supportive.
机译:我们在与墨西哥有条件的现金转移(CCT)计划相结合时,我们研究了对基于集团的育儿支持计划(教育无处不在的)的育儿支持计划(CCT)计划(Prospera,最初Oportunidades和Progresa)。该群集随机试验包括204个社区(最终样本中的N = 1,113名儿童),受社区土着地位分层,并分配仅接收:(T-0)CCT; (T-1)CCT加上社区中EI的可用性;或(T-2)T-1加上CCT计划促进EI计划。采访与基线(2008年,0-18个月)和后续行动(2012年,3-5岁儿童)进行基线(2008年儿童)进行访谈;干预始于基线后开始,并继续为所有符合条件的家庭进行。通过延长的年龄和阶段调查问卷(基线)和儿童发展的麦卡锡等级(随访)评估认知发展;评估员被治疗蒙蔽了。所有分析都有意治疗。当EI收到CCT计划的支持和促进; 95%CI [0.51,8.05]和记忆分数,β= 4.14; 95%CI [0.62,7.66]),效果相当于0.26-0.29 SD。当程序独立运行时没有显着的好处(T-1与T-0)。在分层分析中,EI仅在土着群落中表现出显着影响。我们发现一致的结果在对协变量控制的回归中,差异幅度的减少一些。我们的研究结果表明,基于组的父母级支持计划可以在CCT的上下文中改善儿童结果,但只有在2个计划集成和相互支持时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号