...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetic medicine: A journal of the British Diabetic Association >Is insulin pump therapy effective in Type 1 diabetes?
【24h】

Is insulin pump therapy effective in Type 1 diabetes?

机译:胰岛素泵治疗是否有效于1型糖尿病?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There continues to be uncertainty about the effectiveness in Type 1 diabetes of insulin pump therapy (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, CSII) vs. multiple daily insulin injections (MDI). This narrative review discusses the reasons for this uncertainty, summarizes the current evidence base for CSII and suggests some future research needs. There are difficulties in interpreting trials of CSII because effectiveness varies widely due to factors such as differing baseline control, suboptimal use of best CSII practices, and psychological factors, for example, high external locus of control, non-adherence and lack of motivation. Many summary meta-analyses are also misleading because of poor trial selection (e.g. short duration, obsolete pumps, low baseline rate of hypoglycaemia) and reliance on mean effect size for decision-making. Both MDI and CSII can achieve strict glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia in some people with Type 1 diabetes, especially those who are motivated and have undergone structured diabetes education, and with high levels of ongoing input from healthcare professionals. CSII is particularly effective in those people with Type 1 diabetes who have not achieved target HbA(1c) levels without disabling hypoglycaemia using best attempts with MDI, and here there can be valuable and substantial improvement. Insulin pumps are safe, effective and accepted when used in newly diagnosed diabetes, particularly in children, where MDI may not be practicable. Future research needs include more studies on mortality associated with insulin pumps where registry data have suggested lower rates vs. MDI; and psychological strategies to improve non-adherence and suboptimal glycaemic outcomes on CSII.
机译:胰岛素泵治疗1型糖尿病的有效性继续存在不确定性(连续皮下胰岛素输注,CSII)与多个日常胰岛素注射(MDI)。这种叙述审查讨论了这种不确定性的原因,总结了CSII目前的证据基础,并提出了一些未来的研究需求。在解释CSII的解释试验中存在困难,因为有效性因不同的基线控制,次优使用最佳CSII实践和心理因素的因素而异,例如,对控制的高外部轨迹,不遵守和缺乏动机。许多摘要元分析也是误导性,因为试验选择差(例如,短暂的持续时间,过时泵,低血糖基础血症低的基线率)以及依赖于决策的平均效果大小。 MDI和CSII均可在某些患有1型糖尿病的人中没有低血糖,特别是那些被激励和经历结构性糖尿病教育的人,以及来自医疗保健专业人士的高水平投入。 CSII在那些患有1型糖尿病的人中特别有效,患有靶HBA(1C)水平而不使用MDI的最佳尝试致残性低血症,在这里可能有价值和大幅提高。在新诊断糖尿病中使用时,胰岛素泵是安全的,有效的,并且可接受,特别是在儿童中,MDI可能无法切实可行。未来的研究需求包括更多关于与胰岛素泵相关的死亡率的研究,其中登记数据提出了较低的利率与MDI;以及改善CSII非依从性和次优血糖结果的心理策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号