...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetic medicine: A journal of the British Diabetic Association >Automated symptom and treatment side effect monitoring for improved quality of life among adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in primary care: a pragmatic, cluster, randomized, controlled trial
【24h】

Automated symptom and treatment side effect monitoring for improved quality of life among adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in primary care: a pragmatic, cluster, randomized, controlled trial

机译:自动化症状和治疗副作用监测在初级保健中提高成年人生活质量的改善生活质量:务实,群集,随机,受控试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aims To evaluate the effectiveness of automated symptom and side effect monitoring on quality of life among individuals with symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial (July 2014 to July 2016) within a large healthcare system. We randomized 1834 primary care physicians and prospectively recruited from their lists 1270 individuals with neuropathy who were newly prescribed medications for their symptoms. Intervention participants received automated telephone-based symptom and side effect monitoring with physician feedback over 6 months. The control group received usual care plus three non-interactive diabetes educational calls. Our primary outcomes were quality of life (EQ-5D) and select symptoms (e.g. pain) measured 4-8 weeks after starting medication and again 8 months after baseline. Process outcomes included receiving a clinically effective dose and communication between individuals with neuropathy and their primary care provider over 12 months. Interviewers collecting outcome data were blinded to intervention assignment. Results Some 1252 participants completed the baseline measures [mean age (sd): 67 (11.7), 53% female, 57% white, 8% Asian, 13% black, 20% Hispanic]. In total, 1179 participants (93%) completed follow-up (619 control, 560 intervention). Quality of life scores (intervention: 0.658 +/- 0.094; control: 0.653 +/- 0.092) and symptom severity were similar at baseline. The intervention had no effect on primary [EQ-5D: -0.002 (95% CI -0.01, 0.01), P = 0.623; pain: 0.295 (-0.75, 1.34), P = 0.579; sleep disruption: 0.342 (-0.18, 0.86), P = 0.196; lower extremity functioning: -0.079 (-1.27, 1.11), P = 0.896; depression: -0.462 (-1.24, 0.32); P = 0.247] or process outcomes. Conclusions Automated telephone monitoring and feedback alone were not effective at improving quality of life or symptoms for people with symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02056431).
机译:旨在评估自动症状和副作用监测对患有症状性糖尿病外周神经病变的个体生活质量的有效性。方法我们在大型医疗保健系统中进行了一项务实,集群随机对照试验(2014年7月至2016年7月)。我们随机化了1834名初级保健医生,并从他们的名单1270个体上招募了新的疗法,他们是新规定的药物症状。干预参与者通过6个月内通过医师反馈获得自动化的电话症状和副作用监测。对照组接受了通常护理加上三个非交互式糖尿病教育电话。我们的主要结果是生活质量(EQ-5D),并选择起始药物后4-8周测量的症状(例如疼痛),并在基线后再次8个月。过程结果包括在12个月内接受具有神经病变和初级护理提供者的个体之间的临床有效剂量和沟通。采访者收集结果数据被蒙蔽了干预任务。结果约有1252名参与者完成了基线措施[平均年龄(SD):67(11.7),53%女性,57%白色,8%亚洲,13%黑,20%的西班牙裔。总共,1179名参与者(93%)完成后续后续(619控制,560个干预)。生活质量评分(干预:0.658 +/- 0.094;控制:0.653 +/- 0.092)和症状严重程度在基线时相似。干预对初级[EQ-5D:-0.002(95%CI -0.01,0.01),P = 0.623没有影响;疼痛:0.295(-0.75,1.34),P = 0.579;睡眠中断:0.342(-0.18,0.86),p = 0.196;下肢功能:-0.079(-1.27,1.11),p = 0.896;抑郁症:-0.462(-1.24,0.32); p = 0.247]或过程结果。结论单独的自动化电话监测和反馈在提高有症状性糖尿病外周神经病变的人们的生活质量或症状无效。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02056431)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号