...
首页> 外文期刊>Dental traumatology: official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology >. Re: Sonmez et al. Orthodontic extrusion of a traumatically intruded permanent incisor: a case report with a 5-year follow up.
【24h】

. Re: Sonmez et al. Orthodontic extrusion of a traumatically intruded permanent incisor: a case report with a 5-year follow up.

机译:。 Re:Sonmez等。 正畸挤压创伤性侵入永久性门牙:案例报告,随后有5年的跟进。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I have just received the recent issue of Dental Traumatology and discovered a problem that is common to us all: focus on the most obviously traumatized tooth and neglect of less obvious problems. I'm referring to the case report of orthodontic extrusion of an intruded incisor (Figures 2 and 4 reproduced on previous page). Although the authors have successfully repositioned the intruded left central incisor, they seem to have neglected two critical signs of pulp necrosis of the right central incisor: (1) an apical radiolucency; (2) arrested root development - in this case, the lack of mineralization of the root canal. When comparing the radiograph at the 5-year follow up with the one from the time of injury, it can be seen that the root canal of the right lateral incisor has become obliterated - a sign of minor trauma and healing with a type of scar tissue. Thus what we are seeing is the result of injury to three incisors and not just the left central incisor.
机译:我刚刚收到了最近的牙科创伤学问题,并发现了对我们共同的问题:专注于最明显的创伤牙齿,忽视不太明显的问题。 我指的是侵扰切牙的正畸挤出的病例报告(图2和4上翻了上一页的图4)。 虽然作者成功地重新定位了侵入的左侧中央门牙,但它们似乎忽略了右中央门牙的牙髓坏死的两个关键迹象:(1)顶端透射率; (2)被捕的根系发展 - 在这种情况下,缺乏根管的矿化。 在将射线照相与损伤时间的随访中进行比较时,可以看出右侧切入的根管已被删除 - 次要创伤的迹象,并用一种瘢痕组织愈合 。 因此,我们看到的是对三个门牙伤害的结果,而不仅仅是左侧中央门牙。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号