首页> 外文期刊>Wilderness & environmental medicine >Lightning safety awareness of visitors in three California national parks.
【24h】

Lightning safety awareness of visitors in three California national parks.

机译:三个加州国家公园游客的闪电安全意识。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of lightning safety awareness among visitors at 3 national parks in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California. METHODS: A 12-question, short answer convenience sample survey was administered to participants 18 years of age and over concerning popular trails and points of interest with known lightning activity. There were 6 identifying questions and 5 knowledge-based questions pertaining to lightning that were scored on a binary value of 0 or 1 for a total of 10 points for the survey instrument. Volunteers in Fresno, California, were used as a control group. Participants were categorized as Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Park (SEKI), frontcountry (FC), or backcountry (BC); Yosemite National Park (YNP) FC or BC; and Fresno. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for differences between groups. RESULTS: 467 surveys were included for analysis: 77 in Fresno, 192 in SEKI, and 198 in YNP. National park participants demonstrated greater familiarity with lightning safety than individuals from the metropolitan community (YNP 5.84 and SEKI 5.65 vs Fresno 5.14, P = .0032). There were also differences noted between the BC and FC subgroups (YNP FC 6.07 vs YNP BC 5.62, P = .02; YNP FC 6.07 vs SEKI FC 5.58, P = .02). Overall results showed that participants had certain basic lightning knowledge but lacked familiarity with other key lightning safety recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: While there are statistically significant differences in lightning safety awareness between national parks and metropolitan participants, the clinical impact of these findings are debatable. This study provides a starting point for providing educational outreach to visitors in these national parks.
机译:目的:评估加州塞拉尼亚山脉3个国家公园的访客雷电安全意识水平。方法:12个问题,短暂的回答便利性样品调查由18岁及以上关于具有已知闪电活动的流行跟踪和兴趣点的参与者管理。有6项识别问题和5个基于知识的问题,与闪电有关的闪电,其数量为0或1的分数,共计10个调查仪器。加利福尼亚州弗雷斯诺的志愿者被用作对照组。与会者被分类为SemoIa和Kings Canyon国家公园(Seki),Frontcountry(FC)或Backcountry(BC);优胜美地国家公园(YNP)FC或BC;和弗雷斯诺。方差分析(ANOVA)用于测试组之间的差异。结果:467次调查包括分析:77,在埃斯诺,192年在Seki,198年在YNP。国家公园参与者展示了比来自大都市社区的个人更熟悉的闪电安全(YNP 5.84和Seki 5.65 VS Fresno 5.14,P = .0032)。在BC和FC子组之间存在差异(YNP FC 6.07 VS YNP BC 5.62,P = .02; YNP FC 6.07 VS SEKI FC 5.58,P = .02)。总体结果表明,参与者有一定的基本闪电知识,但缺乏熟悉其他关键的避雷安全建议。结论:虽然国家公园与大都市参与者之间存在统计学意义的避雷安全意识,但这些调查结果的临床影响是有争议的。本研究提供了向这些国家公园的访客提供教育外展的起点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号