...
首页> 外文期刊>Vox Sanguinis: International Journal of Blood Transfusion and Immunohaematology >Ex vivo haemostatic capacity of plasma upon thawing and beyond: a comparison between fresh frozen plasma ( FFP FFP ) and frozen plasma prepared from whole blood stored at room temperature up to 24?hours postcollection ( RTFP RTFP 24)
【24h】

Ex vivo haemostatic capacity of plasma upon thawing and beyond: a comparison between fresh frozen plasma ( FFP FFP ) and frozen plasma prepared from whole blood stored at room temperature up to 24?hours postcollection ( RTFP RTFP 24)

机译:在解冻及以外的等离子体中的前体内血管酱容量:新鲜冷冻等离子体(FFP FFP)和冷冻等离子体在室温下储存的全血,最高可达24小时(RTFP RTFP 24)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/objectives We compared the ex?vivo haemostatic capacity of RTFP 24 with FFP upon thawing and 24?h post‐thaw. We included thrombin generation ( TG ) as few studies had compared global haemostatic function, and most did not directly compare RTFP 24 with FFP 24?h post‐thaw. Materials/methods Twenty units each of RTFP 24 and FFP were measured for coagulation factors and thrombin generation upon thawing (D0) and 4?days post‐thaw (D4). Labile factors were also measured from D1 to D3. 10 single cryoprecipitate units were each prepared from FFP and RTFP 24, and measured for FXIII , FVIII and fibrinogen at D0. Results At D0, RTFP 24 was comparable to FFP except for lower FV , protein S, endogenous thrombin potential ( ETP ) and higher FXIII . These differences were likely clinically insignificant since 95% and 80% of RTFP 24 met our laboratory's reference ranges for FV /protein S and ETP , respectively. There were no differences between RTFP 24‐ and FFP ‐derived cryoprecipitate. At D4, RTFP 24 was comparable to FFP except for lower FV , ETP , and higher FXI and FXIII . More RTFP 24 than FFP had ETP lower than our laboratory's reference range (45% vs 15%). Multiple coagulation factors and all TG parameters declined from their respective baselines. The percentage declines were comparable or less in RTFP 24, except for protein C, fibrinogen and time to peak. Conclusion RTFP 24 and FFP , and their derived cryoprecipitate have comparable haemostatic capacity upon thawing. RTFP 24 has poorer TG potential than FFP 24?h post‐thaw, not supporting universal extension of RTFP 24's shelf life except to facilitate urgent transfusions for massive haemorrhage.
机译:背景/目标我们在解冻后与FFP进行了比较了RTFP 24的EX?体内血管酱容量。我们包括凝血酶生成(TG),因为少数研究比较了全球血压函数,并且大多数人没有直接比较RTFP 24与FFP&冻后24℃。材料/方法在解冻后的凝血因子和凝血酶(D4)后测量凝血因子和凝血酶的凝血因子和凝血酶(D4)中的凝血因子(D4)。没有从D1到D3测量不稳定因子。每次由FFP和RTFP 24制备10个单一冷冻沉淀单位,并测量D0的FXIII,FVIII和纤维蛋白原。在D0,RTFP 24的结果与FFP相当,除了低fV,蛋白质S,内源性凝血酶电位(ETP)和更高的FXIII。由于95%和80%的RTFP 24符合我们的实验室的FV /蛋白S和ETP,因此这些差异可能临床微不足道。 RTFP 24-和FFP -Derived CryPrecipitits之间没有差异。在D4,除了低FV,ETP和更高的FXI和FXIII之外,RTFP 24与FFP相当。更多的RTFP 24比FFP的RETP低于我们实验室的参考范围(45%vs 15%)。多种凝血因子和所有TG参数从各自的基线下降。除了蛋白质C,纤维蛋白原和峰值时间外,RTFP 24的百分比下降或更少。结论RTFP 24和FFP,其衍生的冷皮沉淀物在解冻后具有可比的血压能力。 RTFP 24具有比FFP&GT的TG电位差。在解冻后24次,而不支持RTFP 24的保质期的普遍延伸,除了促进急性出血的紧急输血。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号