首页> 外文期刊>Zoo Biology >Assessment of hematologic and corticosterone response in free-living eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina carolina) at capture and after handling
【24h】

Assessment of hematologic and corticosterone response in free-living eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina carolina) at capture and after handling

机译:在捕获和处理之后评估自由生活东部龟(Terrapene Carolina Carolina)的血液学和皮质酮反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hematology is a common tool for wildlife health assessments. Manual leukocyte counts are required in reptiles, however, disagreement between quantification methods has been observed in some chelonians. This study determined agreement between two methods of leukocyte quantification, eosinophilic leukopet, and blood film white blood cell (WBC) estimates, in free-living eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina carolina). Simultaneously, we assessed the impact of handling duration on both leukocyte quantity and corticosterone levels. We collected blood at capture (<2 min from disturbance) and again before release 30-150 min later from 92 box turtles at six sites in Illinois and Tennessee. Constant and proportional error was present in the leukopet results for WBC, lymphocytes, and basophils compared to the estimate method. Both methods were in agreement for heterophils, monocytes, and eosinophils. Agreement between the methods was significantly more likely at WBC counts below 23,241/mu l. All hematologic parameters were significantly higher at the final blood draw compared to the initial blood draw using both WBC determination methods, except relative eosinophil and basophil counts. Corticosterone levels varied with time, with maximum concentrations reached at 54 min postcapture, followed by a rapid return to baseline levels. Corticosterone level was not significantly associated with any hematologic parameter or sex. This study provides a framework for understanding the effects of animal handling methodology and diagnostic modality when evaluating hematologic health in box turtles.
机译:血液学是野生动物健康评估的常用工具。在爬行动物中需要手动白细胞计数,然而,在一些小间族人中已经观察到量化方法之间的分歧。本研究确定了两种白细胞定量,嗜酸性白细胞,血膜白细胞(WBC)估计的两种方法之间的一致性,在自由生活的东部龟(Terrapene Carolina Carolina)。同时,我们评估了处理持续时间对白细胞量和皮质酮水平的影响。我们在苏利诺伊州和田纳西州的六个地点发布30-150分钟后收集捕获(<2分钟)捕获(<2分钟)和再次收集血液。与估计方法相比,WBC,淋巴细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞的Leukopet结果存在恒定和比例误差。两种方法都符合异蹄细胞,单核细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞。在23,241 / mu的WBC计数下,方法之间的达成恰当可能更有可能。除了使用WBC测定方法外,除了相对嗜酸性粒细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞计数之外,与初始血液绘制相比,最终血液绘制的所有血液学参数均明显高。皮质酮水平随时间变化,最大浓度在54分钟后达到,然后快速返回基线水平。皮质酮水平与任何血液学参数或性别无关。本研究提供了理解动物处理方法和诊断方式在评估箱龟中的血液学健康时的影响的框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号