...
首页> 外文期刊>Zeitschrift fur Arznei- und Gewurzpflanzen >A systematic review of reviews: Recruitment and retention of rural family physicians
【24h】

A systematic review of reviews: Recruitment and retention of rural family physicians

机译:对评论的系统审查:招聘和保留农村家庭医师

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: The recruitment and retention of family physicians in rural and remote communities has been the topic of many reviews; however, a lack of consensus among them with regard to which factors are most influential makes it difficult for setting priorities. We performed a systematic review of reviews which helped to establish an overall conclusion and provided a set of fundamental influential factors, regardless of the consistency or generalisability of the findings across reviews. This review also identified the knowledge gaps and areas of priority for future research.Methods: A literature search was conducted to find the review articles discussing the factors of recruitment or retention of rural family physicians. Results were screened by two independent reviewers. The number of times that each factor was mentioned in the literature was counted and ordered in terms of frequency.Results: The literature search identified 84 systematic reviews. Fourteen met the inclusion criteria, from which 158 specific factors were identified and summarised into 11 categories: personal, health, family, training, practice, work, professional, pay, community, regional and system/legislation. The three categories referenced most often were training, personal and practice. The specific individual factors mentioned most often in the literature were 'medical school characteristics', 'longitudinal rural training' and 'raised in a small town'.Conclusion: The three most often cited categories resemble three distinct phases of a family physician's life: pre-medical school, medical school and post-medical school. To increase the number of physicians who choose to work in rural practice, strategies must encompass and promote continuity across all three of these phases. The results of this systematic review will allow for the identification of areas of priority that require further attention to develop appropriate strategies to improve the number of family physicians working in rural and remote locations.
机译:简介:农村和远程社区家庭医师的招聘和保留是许多评论的主题;但是,关于它们在哪些因素中缺乏共识,这些因素最具影响力使得难以确定优先事项。我们对评论进行了系统审查,有助于建立整体结论,并提供了一系列基本的影响因素,无论评论中的调查结果一致或可稳定性如何。本综述还确定了未来研究的知识差距和优先事项。方法:进行文献搜索,找到讨论招聘或保留农村家庭医生的因素的审查文章。结果由两个独立审稿人筛选。在文献中提到的每个因素的次数被计算并在频率方面订购。结果:文献搜索确定了84个系统评价。十四符合纳入标准,从中确定并汇总了158个特定因素:个人,健康,家庭,培训,实践,工作,专业,薪酬,社区,区域和制度/立法。这三个类别最常见的是培训,个人和实践。文学中最常见的具体个体因素是“医学学校特征”,“纵向农村培训”和“在一个小城镇中提出。结论:三个最常用的类别类似于家庭医师生活的三个不同阶段:前 - 医学院,医学院和后医学院。为了增加选择在农村实践中工作的医生数量,策略必须包括在所有三个阶段的所有三个阶段的连续性。该系统审查的结果将允许确定需要进一步关注的优先领域,以制定适当的策略,以改善在农村和偏远地区工作的家庭医生数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号