首页> 外文期刊>Hypertension: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Arterial Stiffness Gradient, Systemic Reflection Coefficient, and Pulsatile Pressure Wave Transmission in Essential Hypertension
【24h】

Arterial Stiffness Gradient, Systemic Reflection Coefficient, and Pulsatile Pressure Wave Transmission in Essential Hypertension

机译:基因高血压中的动脉僵硬梯度,全身反射系数和脉动压力波传输

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Arterial stiffness and impedance gradients are known to influence pressure wave propagation and macrovascular-microvascular interactions. We studied the association between the carotid-femoral arterial stiffness gradient and the systemic reflection coefficient (N=393); of this population, 246 also underwent assessment of forward/backward pressure wave propagation and microvascular pulsatile pressure transmission (MPPT). Hemodynamic parameters were measured noninvasively. From peripheral vascular resistance and characteristic impedance, we estimated the systemic reflection coefficient and MPPT on peripheral and cardiac microcirculation in age-matched, sex-matched and body mass index-matched individuals with (n=147) or without (n=98) hypertension. The arterial stiffness gradient, systemic reflection coefficient, and correlations between the arterial stiffness gradient and age or blood pressure were similar in both populations. MPPT was higher in hypertension (P<0.0001), and the subendocardial viability (Buckberg) index lower (P<0.0001). In both populations, the systemic reflection coefficient and arterial stiffness gradient were significantly associated with changes in MPPT and the subendocardial viability index. Despite similar systemic reflection coefficients, the carotid reflected pressure and MPPT were higher in hypertension. Maintaining the systemic reflection coefficient within normal ranges was, therefore, insufficient to compensate for higher carotid forward pressure waves which, in hypertension, were associated with increased aortic stiffness (P<0.0001) and higher stroke volume (P=0.0365). Independently of cardiovascular risk, hypertension-induced changes have a weighted effect on MPPT, although insufficient to compensate for increased forward pressure waves. In hypertension, elevated aortic stiffness negatively affects the arterial stiffness gradient and systemic reflection coefficient but positively affects forward pressure.
机译:已知动脉僵硬度和阻抗梯度影响压力波传播和大血管微血管相互作用。我们研究了颈动脉僵硬度梯度和全身反射系数之间的关联(n = 393);在该群体中,246也经过正向/后向压力波传播和微血管脉动压力传递(MPPT)的评估。血流动力学参数是非血液动力学参数。从外周血血管抵抗和特征阻抗,估计年龄匹配,性匹配和体重指数匹配个体的外周和心脏微循环对全身反射系数和MPPT(n = 147)或没有(n = 98)高血压。在两个人群中,动脉僵硬梯度,系统反射系数和动脉刚度梯度和年龄或血压之间的相关性相似。 MPPT在高血压(P <0.0001)中较高,潜在活力(Buckberg)指数降低(P <0.0001)。在两个人群中,系统反射系数和动脉僵硬度梯度与MPPT和潜在的活力指数的变化显着相关。尽管系统反射系数类似,高血压的颈动脉反射压力和MPPT较高。因此,维持正常范围内的全身反射系数是不充分的,以补偿高血压的更高颈动脉前压波与增加的主动脉僵硬度(P <0.0001)和更高的中风体积相关(P = 0.0365)。独立于心血管风险,高血压引起的变化对MPPT具有加权影响,尽管不足以补偿增加的前向压力波。在高血压中,主动脉僵硬度升高对动脉僵硬梯度和全身反射系数产生负面影响,但积极影响正向压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号