...
首页> 外文期刊>Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics. >Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines
【24h】

Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines

机译:报告旨在改善疫苗接种覆盖率的干预措施的系统审查质量:遵守Prisma指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Systematic reviews have become increasingly important for informing clinical practice and policy; however, little is known about the reporting characteristics and quality of SRs of interventions to improve immunization coverage in different settings. The aim of this study was to assess the reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage using the recommended Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guideline. PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched to identify SRs of interventions to improve immunization coverage, indexed up to May 2016. Two authors independently screened the search output, assessed study eligibility, and extracted data from eligible SRs using a 27-item data collection form derived from PRISMA. Discrepancies in reviews assessments were resolved by discussion and consensus. A total of 57 reviews were included in this study with a mean percentage of applicable PRISMA items that were met across all studies of 66% (range 19-100%) and median compliance of 70%. 39 out of the 57 reviews were published after the release of the PRISMA statement in 2009. Highest compliance was observed in items related to the "description of rational", "description of eligibility criteria", "synthesis of results" and "provision of a general interpretation of the results" (items #3, #6, #14 and #26, respectively). Compliance was poorest in the items "describing summary of evidence" (item 24, 19%), "describing indication of review protocol and registration" (item 5, 26%) and "describing results of risk of bias across studies (item 22, 33%). The overall reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions to improve vaccination coverage requires significant improvement. There remains a need for additional research targeted at addressing potential barriers to compliance and strategies to improve compliance with PRISMA guideline.
机译:系统的评论越来越重要,以了解临床实践和政策;然而,关于在不同环境中提高免疫覆盖的报告特征和质量的报告特征和质量几乎是知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估旨在通过建议的系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的推荐首选报告项目改善疫苗接种覆盖的干预措施的报告质量。搜索了PUBMED和COCHRANE图书馆以识别改善免疫覆盖的干预措施,索引到2016年5月。两位作者独立筛选了搜索产出,评估了研究资格,并使用来自的27项数据收集表格从符合条件的SRS中提取数据。 prisma。评论评估的差异是通过讨论和共识解决的。本研究共纳入了57条评定,均为适用的PRISMA物品的平均百分比,这些项目在所有研究中均为66%(范围19-100%)和70%的中位数。在2009年释放Prisma声明后,39条评论中出版。在与“理性描述”,“资格描述”,“结果综合”和“提供”的项目相关的物品中,观察到最高的合规性。结果的一般解释“(分别项目#3,#6,#14和#26)。合规性在“描述证据摘要”(第24项,19%),“描述审查议定书和注册”(第5项,26%)和“描述跨越研究风险的结果(第22项”(第22项)的项目(第22项, 33%)。整体报告系统的整体报告质量的干预措施改善疫苗接种覆盖率需要重大改善。仍然需要额外研究,以解决遵守遵守和策略的潜在障碍,以改善Prisma指南的遵守情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号