首页> 外文期刊>Human movement science >Comparison of pre-contact joint kinematics and vertical impulse between vertical jump landings and step-off landings from equal heights
【24h】

Comparison of pre-contact joint kinematics and vertical impulse between vertical jump landings and step-off landings from equal heights

机译:比较垂直跳转落地与垂直跳转与等高度的降落间垂直脉冲的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although impact phase differences between vertical jump landings (VJL) and step-off landings (STL) may be related to task-specific pre-contact strategies, pre-contact mechanics are rarely examined. Thus, pre-contact kinematics and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) impulse were examined between VJL and STL. Ten health adults (20.9 +/- 1.6 yrs; 167.8 +/- 4.2 cm; 68.5 +/- 7.15 kg) performed 15 VJL and 15 STL from equal heights. Limb (lead; trail) by task (VJL; STL) ANOVAs (alpha = 0.05) compared hip, knee, and ankle joint angles 150 ms pre-contact, 100 ms pre-contact, 50 ms pre-contact, and at ground contact. Joint angular displacement was also evaluated between 150 ms pre-contact and ground contact, vGRF impulse was compared during the loading (ground contact to peak vGRF) and attenuation (peak vGRF to end of impact) phases. Greater hip flexion angles occurred during STL versus VJL at each event except 150 ms pre-contact (p = .004). Trail limb knee flexion angles were greater at each event when compared to the lead limb during STL (p = .019). Greater trail limb knee flexion angles occurred during STL versus VJL at all four events (p = .018), while greater plantarflexion angles occurred at all four events during VJL versus STL (p = .034). During STL, greater trail limb plantarflexion angles were detected at each event versus the lead limb (p .001). Lesser hip, lead and trail limb knee displacement occurred during STL versus VJL (p .05). Greater vGRF impulse was detected during the loading phase of VJL ( .001), while greater vGRF impulse occurred during the attenuation phase of STL (p = .025). These tasks are characterized by distinct pre-contact kinematic strategies and post-contact kinetics. The task utilized in practice should reflect the requirements of the population of interest.
机译:虽然垂直跳转落地(VJL)和升压着陆(STL)之间的冲击阶段差异可能与任务特定的预接触策略有关,但很少检查前接触机制。因此,在VJL和STL之间检查预接触运动学和垂直地反作用力(VGRF)脉冲。十个健康成年人(20.9 +/- 1.6 YRS; 167.8 +/- 4.2厘米; 68.5 +/- 7.15千克)从相同的高度进行15 VJL和15个STL。通过任务(VJL; STL)Anovas(alpha = 0.05)比较臀部,膝关节和踝关节角150ms预接触,100ms预接触,50ms预接触,以及在接地接触。在150 ms的前接触和接地接触之间也评估了接头角位移,在装载(接地接触至峰值VGRF)期间比较了VGRF脉冲,并衰减(峰值VGRF到冲击末端)阶段。在除150ms预接触之外的每个事件中,在STL与VJL期间发生更大的髋关节屈曲角度(P& = .004)。与STL期间的引线肢体相比,每次发生径至肢体膝关节屈曲角度较大(P <= .019)。在所有四个事件的STL与VJL之间发生更大的径肢膝部屈曲角度(P& = .018),而在VJL与STL期间,在所有四个事件中发生了更大的Plantarflexion角度(P& = .034)。在STL期间,在每个事件中检测到更大的小径肢体跖曲角,而引线肢体(P <.001)。较小的臀部,铅和小径肢体膝关节位移在STL与VJL(P& 05)期间发生。在VJL(&lt中)的加载阶段期间检测到更大的VGRF脉冲,而在STL的衰减阶段期间发生了更大的VGRF脉冲(P = .025)。这些任务的特点是不同的预接触运动策略和接触后动力学。在实践中使用的任务应反映利益人口的要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号