...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Heredity >A unified framework for detecting genetic association with multiple SNPs in a candidate gene or region: contrasting genotype scores and LD patterns between cases and controls.
【24h】

A unified framework for detecting genetic association with multiple SNPs in a candidate gene or region: contrasting genotype scores and LD patterns between cases and controls.

机译:统一框架,用于检测候选基因或区域中多个SNP的遗传关联:对比基因型评分和病例和对照之间的LD图案。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is critical to develop and apply powerful statistical tests for genetic association studies due to typically weak associations with complex human diseases or phenotypes. For population-based case-control studies with unphased multilocus genotype data, most of the existing methods are based on comparing genotype scores, e.g. allele frequencies, between the case and control groups. Another class of approaches are motivated to contrast linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns between the two groups. It is expected that no single test can be uniformly most powerful across all situations, and different tests may perform better under different scenarios. A recent effort has been devoted to combining the above two classes of approaches, which however has some potential drawbacks. Here we propose a general and simple framework to unify the above two classes of approaches: it is based on the simple idea to incorporate LD measurements, in addition to genotype scores, as covariates in a logistic regression model, from which various tests can be constructed by taking advantage of the nice properties of the score statistics for the logistic model. It also has an advantage in easily accommodating covariates and other study designs. We use simulated data to show that our proposed tests performed well across several scenarios. In particular, in contrast to either of the two classes of the tests that is only powerful in detecting only one, but not both, of the two types of the distributional differences between cases and controls, our proposed tests are sensitive to both.
机译:由于通常具有复杂的人类疾病或表型的弱义,因此为遗传结社研究产生强大的统计测试至关重要。对于基于人群的案例对照研究,具有不相传的多点基因型数据,大多数现有方法基于比较基因型评分,例如,等位基因频率,案例和控制组之间。另一种方法是在两组之间的造影性不平衡(LD)模式进行造影性。预计在所有情况下,没有单一测试可以均匀地是最强大的,不同的测试可以在不同的情况下表现更好。最近的努力已经致力于结合上述两类方法,然而具有一些潜在的缺点。在这里,我们提出了一般性和简单的框架来统一上述两类方法:它基于掺入LD测量的简单思想,除了基因型评分之外,作为逻辑回归模型中的协变量,可以从中构建各种测试通过利用物流模型的分数统计的很好的特性。它还具有易于容纳协调因子和其他研究设计的优势。我们使用模拟数据来表明我们的建议测试跨越多种情况良好。特别是,与两个类别中的任何一个只有强大的测试中的任何一个,而不是两种类型的测试,相反,在案例和控制之间的分布差别中的两种分布差别中,我们所提出的测试对两者敏感。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Human Heredity》 |2010年第1期|共13页
  • 作者

    Pan W;

  • 作者单位

    Division of Biostatistics MMC 303 School of Public Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN 55455-0392 USA.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医学遗传学;人类遗传学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号