...
首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Evaluation of low-dose CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction after endovascular aneurysm repair of a thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm
【24h】

Evaluation of low-dose CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction after endovascular aneurysm repair of a thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm

机译:小剂量CT血管造影在基于胸腔或腹主动脉瘤的腔内动脉瘤修复后基于模型的迭代重建中的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate image quality and overall adequacy of low-dose CT angiography (CTA) with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in patients who had undergone endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of a thoracic or abdominal MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty patients, all of whom had undergone standard-dose CTA performed previously with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR), underwent low-dose CTA for surveillance after EVAR. Two radiologists randomly evaluated both studies, and quality parameters were assessed. The maximal aneurysm diameter was measured, and the images were evaluated to see whether an endoleak was present. The image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. The volume CT dose index and dose-length product were recorded. RESULTS. The mean image score for low-dose CTA was acceptable to very good in all categories of assessment. There was no significant difference between low-dose CTA and standard-dose CTA in the evaluation of the stent lumen. Subjective assessments of stent configuration, aneurysm outline, aortic branch vessel outline, overall adequacy of vascular imaging, and overall adequacy of solid organ imaging were superior on standard-dose CTA. Interobserver agreement for endoleak detection was higher for low-dose CTA. There was no significant difference in the mean aneurysm diameter between the two readers on low-dose CTA and standard-dose CTA. The effective radiation dose for low-dose CTA was lower than standard-dose CTA during both the arterial (mean, 4.4 vs 16.2 mSv, respectively) and the delayed (2.4 vs 6.7 mSv) phase acquisitions. The measured image noise was lower (14.7 vs 19.3 HU) and CNR was higher (25.6 vs 17.1) on the low-dose CTA studies than on the standard-dose CTA studies. CONCLUSION. Low-dose CTA with MBIR enables up to 73% dose reduction as compared with CTA performed with ASIR while maintaining diagnostic adequacy for CTA surveillance of patients who have undergone EVAR of a thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm.
机译:目的。我们研究的目的是评估经胸腔或腹腔血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)的患者基于模型的迭代重建(MBIR)的低剂量CT血管造影(CTA)的图像质量和总体充分性。材料和方法。 30例患者均接受了标准剂量的CTA,先前均接受了自适应统计迭代重建(ASIR),并在EVAR后接受了小剂量的CTA监测。两名放射科医生对两项研究进行了随机评估,并对质量参数进行了评估。测量最大动脉瘤直径,并评估图像以查看是否存在内漏。测量图像噪声和对比度噪声比(CNR)。记录体积CT剂量指数和剂量长度乘积。结果。在所有评估类别中,低剂量CTA的平均图像评分都非常好。在评估支架内腔时,小剂量CTA与标准剂量CTA之间没有显着差异。在标准剂量的CTA上,对支架构型,动脉瘤轮廓,主动脉分支血管轮廓,血管成像的总体充分性以及实体器官成像的总体充分性的主观评估要好得多。对于低剂量CTA,观察者之间的内漏检测协议更高。在低剂量CTA和标准剂量CTA上,两个阅读器的平均动脉瘤直径之间无显着差异。低剂量CTA的有效放射剂量在动脉期(分别为4.4 vs 16.2 mSv)和延迟(2.4 vs 6.7 mSv)采集期间均低于标准剂量CTA。与标准剂量CTA研究相比,低剂量CTA研究的图像噪声更低(14.7 vs 19.3 HU),CNR更高(25.6 vs 17.1)。结论。与采用ASIR进行的CTA相比,采用MBIR的低剂量CTA可使剂量减少多达73%,同时保持了对接受胸腔或腹部主动脉瘤EVAR的患者进行CTA监视的诊断能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号