The idea of resolving dispute through the exchange of arguments and reasons has been central to society for millennia. We exchange arguments as a way of getting at the truth in contexts as diverse as science, the court room, and our everyday lives. In democracies, political decisions should be negotiated through argument, not deception, or even worse, brute force. If argument is to lead to the truth or to good decisions, then some arguments must be better than others and 'argument strength' must have some meaningful connection with truth. Can argument strength be measured in a way that tracks an objective relationship with truth and not just mere persuasiveness? This article describes recent developments in providing such measures.
展开▼
机译:转换术语± Sup> [n i Sub>] f(+/-) min sup>的条件最小化结构的逻辑动态过程的方法Sub> AND ± Sup> [m i Sub>] f(+/-) min Sub>在功能添加结构中± Sup> f < Sub> 1 Sub>(Σ RU Sub>) min Sub>,不带纹波f 1 Sub>(± Sup>←←)和循环ΔtΣ Sub>→5∙f(&)-和5个条件逻辑函数f(&)-,并通过三元数系统的算术公理同时转换术语参数的过程f RU Sub>(+ 1,0,-1)及其实现其的功能结构(俄罗斯逻辑版本)