【24h】

Editorial

机译:社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been much hand-wringing about the tragic loss of Charles Rennie Mackintosh’s Glasgow School of Art. The fire that recently ripped through the building is a harsh reminder of the fragility of our built heritage. It seems to have been almost unthinkable to most commentators that this could have happened. However, maritime historians are no strangers to the loss of architectural splendour and have reacted in a much more sanguine fashion. Mackintosh, unlike many architects of his time did not design any interiors for the liners that were being built in their multitude on the Clyde, but if he had, they would have long since been consigned to the scrapyard or to the bottom of the sea. Both Queen Elizabeth and Normandie were similarly consumed by fire and then sank, and of course there is always Titanic. And Lusitania. And countless others that have met a similar fate.
机译:关于Charles Rennie Mackintosh的Glasgow艺术学院的悲惨损失,有很多手工扭曲。 最近通过建筑物撕裂的火灾是一种严酷的提醒我们建造遗产的脆弱性。 对于大多数评论者来说,这似乎几乎是不可想象的。 然而,海事历史学家对建筑辉煌的失去并没有陌生人,并以更加乐观的方式做出反应。 MackintoSh不像他的时间的许多建筑师都没有为克莱德的众多建造的衬里设计任何内部的内部,但如果他有,他们将长期托运到Scrapyard或海底。 女王伊丽莎白和诺曼底同样消耗,然后沉没,当然总有泰坦尼克号。 和卢茨尼亚。 并且无数遇到了类似命运的其他人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号