首页> 外文期刊>Health & social care in the community >The involvement of volunteers in palliative care and their collaboration with healthcare professionals: A cross‐sectional volunteer survey across the Flemish healthcare system (Belgium)
【24h】

The involvement of volunteers in palliative care and their collaboration with healthcare professionals: A cross‐sectional volunteer survey across the Flemish healthcare system (Belgium)

机译:志愿者参与姑息治疗及其与医疗保健专业人士的合作:跨越佛兰芒医疗保健系统(比利时)的横断面志愿者调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Volunteers occupy a specific space in the delivery of palliative care (PC), addressing specific aspects of care and providing a link between professional healthcare providers and informal care. Engaging and empowering these volunteers can be an important strategy to deliver more integrated and comprehensive PC. Insights into current actual volunteer involvement and collaboration across different healthcare services providing generalist and specialist PC is lacking. This study aims to describe volunteers’ involvement in the organisation of PC, collaboration with professionals and how they evaluate this. A cross‐sectional postal survey of volunteers was conducted between June and November 2018 using a written questionnaire. A two‐step disproportionately stratified cluster randomised sample of 2,273 registered volunteers was taken from different strata of healthcare organisations providing care for people with serious illnesses in the Flemish healthcare system (Belgium). Overall response was 35% (15%–60% for individual strata). About 67% of volunteers were often to always informed about the organisation of patient care and 48% felt the organisation often to always takes their opinion into account, while a minority report having decision rights (18%) or autonomy (24%). For some, their organisation failed to inform (17%), consult (27%), take into account their opinion (21%), give them decision rights (20%) or autonomy (16%) over certain aspects of patient care provision often enough. Overall, volunteer–professional collaboration was low, and mostly limited to information sharing. Dedicated PC volunteers collaborated extensively with nurses, often involving task coordination (46%). Ambiguity regarding tasks, agreements and/or rules (15%) and lack of information exchange (14%) were the most cited barriers to volunteer–professional collaboration. Many volunteers were open to stronger involvement in the organisation of care in PC services. Collaboration with professionals seemed lacking in width and depth. Particularly, nursing home volunteers indicated a desire and large potential for more involved and collaborative roles in PC provision.
机译:摘要志愿者占据姑息治疗(PC)的特定空间,解决了小心的具体方面,并提供了专业医疗保健提供者和非正式护理之间的联系。参与和赋予这些志愿者可以成为提供更集成和全面PC的重要策略。缺乏缺乏不同医疗服务的当前实际志愿参与和合作,提供一般主义者和专业PC的洞察。本研究旨在描述志愿者参与PC组织,与专业人士的合作以及他们如何评估这一点。 2018年6月至2018年11月在2018年6月至2018年11月之间进行了横断面邮政调查。两步不成比例地分层的聚类2,273名已注册志愿者的随机样本是从医疗保健组织的不同层次,为佛兰芒医疗保健系统(比利时)的严重疾病提供护理。整体反应为35%(个体地层的15%-60%)。大约67%的志愿者经常被告知患者护理组织,48%的人认为,本组织经常始终考虑他们的意见,而少数群体报告则具有决策权(18%)或自治(24%)。对于一些人来说,他们的组织未能通知(17%),咨询(27%),考虑到他们的意见(21%),在患者护理规定的某些方面给予他们决策权(20%)或自治权(16%)通常足够。总的来说,志愿者 - 专业合作很低,而且主要限于信息共享。专用PC志愿者与护士进行了广泛的合作,通常涉及任务协调(46%)。关于任务,协议和/或规则(15%)和缺乏信息交换(14%)的歧义是志愿者专业合作最为引用的障碍。许多志愿者在PC服务中的护理组织方面更强大。与专业人士的合作似乎缺乏宽度和深度。特别是,护理家庭志愿者表明了PC提供的更多参与和协作角色的愿望和巨大潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号