...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >How do external donors influence national health policy processes? Experiences of domestic policy actors in Cambodia and Pakistan
【24h】

How do external donors influence national health policy processes? Experiences of domestic policy actors in Cambodia and Pakistan

机译:外部捐助者如何影响国家卫生政策过程? 柬埔寨和巴基斯坦国内政策行为者的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although concerns have historically been raised about the influence of external donors on health policy process in recipient countries, remarkably few studies have investigated perspectives and experiences of domestic policymakers and advisers. This study examines donor influence at different stages of the health policy process (priority setting, policy formulation, policy implementation and monitoring and evaluation) in two aid-dependent LMICs, Cambodia and Pakistan. It identifies mechanisms through which asymmetries in influence between donors and domestic policy actors emerge. We conducted 24?key informant interviews—14 in Pakistan and 10 in Cambodia—with high-level decision-makers who inform or authorize health priority setting, allocate resources and/or are responsible for policy implementation, identifying three routes of influence: financial resources, technical expertise and indirect financial and political incentives. We used both inductive and deductive approaches to analyse the data. Our findings indicate that different routes of influence emerged depending on the stage of the policy process. Control of financial resources was the most commonly identified route by which donors influenced priority setting and policy implementation. Greater (perceived) technical expertise played an important role in donor influence at the policy formulation stage. Donors’ power in influencing decisions, particularly during the final (monitoring and evaluation) stage of the policy process, was mediated by their ability to control indirect financial and political incentives as well as direct control of financial resources. This study thus helps unpack the nuances of donor influence over health policymaking in these settings, and can potentially indicate areas that require attention to increase the ownership of domestic actors of their countries’ health policy processes.
机译:虽然历史上担心了外部捐助者对受援国健康政策过程的影响,但很少有研究已经调查了国内政策制定者和顾问的观点和经验。本研究审查了在两个援助依赖的LMIC,柬埔寨和巴基斯坦的卫生政策进程(优先设定,政策制定,政策实施和监测和监测和评估)不同阶段的捐助者影响。它确定了捐助者与国内政策行为者之间影响的不对称的机制。我们在巴基斯坦进行了24次进行了24次,在巴基斯坦和柬埔寨的10个 - 与高级别决策者,通知或授权健康优先设施,分配资源和/或负责政策实施,确定三个影响途径:财务资源,技术专业知识和间接的金融和政治激励措施。我们使用归纳和演绎方法来分析数据。我们的调查结果表明,根据政策过程的阶段出现了不同的影响途径。财政资源控制是捐助者影响优先事项设定和政策实施的最常用的路线。更大(感知)技术专业知识在捐助者的影响下对政策制定阶段产生了重要作用。捐助者在影响决策中的权力,特别是在政策过程的最终(监测和评估)阶段,是通过控制间接财政和政治激励的能力以及直接控制财政资源的能力介绍。因此,这项研究有助于解压缩捐助者对这些环境中健康政策制定的影响的细微差别,并且可能表明需要注意增加其国家卫生政策过程的国内行动者所有权的领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号