首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Do academic knowledge brokers exist? Using social network analysis to explore academic research-to-policy networks from six schools of public health in Kenya
【24h】

Do academic knowledge brokers exist? Using social network analysis to explore academic research-to-policy networks from six schools of public health in Kenya

机译:学术知识经纪存在吗? 利用社会网络分析探讨了肯尼亚六所公共卫生学校的学术研究 - 政策网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The potential for academic research institutions to facilitate knowledge exchange and influence evidence-informed decision-making has been gaining ground. Schools of public health (SPHs) may play a key knowledge brokering role-serving as agencies of and for development. Understanding academic-policymaker networks can facilitate the enhancement of links between policymakers and academic faculty at SPHs, as well as assist in identifying academic knowledge brokers (KBs). Using a census approach, we administered a sociometric survey to academic faculty across six SPHs in Kenya to construct academic-policymaker networks. We identified academic KBs using social network analysis (SNA) in a two-step approach: First, we ranked individuals based on (1) number of policymakers in their network; (2) number of academic peers who report seeking them out for advice on knowledge translation and (3) their network position as 'inter-group connectors'. Second, we triangulated the three scores and re-ranked individuals. Academic faculty scoring within the top decile across all three measures were classified as KBs. Results indicate that each SPH commands a variety of unique as well as overlapping relationships with national ministries in Kenya. Of 124 full-time faculty, we identified 7 KBs in 4 of the 6 SPHs. Those scoring high on the first measure were not necessarily the same individuals scoring high on the second. KBs were also situated in a wide range along the 'connector/betweenness' measure. We propose that a composite score rather than traditional 'betweenness centrality', provides an alternative means of identifying KBs within these networks. In conclusion, SNA is a valuable tool for identifying academic-policymaker networks in Kenya. More efforts to conduct similar network studies would permit SPH leadership to identify existing linkages between faculty and policymakers, shared linkages with other SPHs and gaps so as to contribute to evidence-informed health policies.
机译:学术研究机构促进知识交流的潜力,并影响证据知情的决策已经获得了基础。公共卫生学院(SPHS)可能会发挥关键知识经纪人的作用,担任和发展的机构。了解学术政策制定网络可以促进加强政策制定者与学术教师在SPHS之间的联系,以及协助识别学术知识经纪人(KBS)。使用人口普查方法,我们向肯尼亚的六个SPH进行了社会测量调查,以构建学术政策制定网络。我们在两步方法中使用社交网络分析(SNA)确定了学术kBs:首先,我们根据(1)网络中的政策制定者数量排名; (2)向他们寻求关于知识翻译的建议的学术同行数量和(3)作为“组间连接器”的网络位置。其次,我们将三个分数和重新排名的人进行三角化。所有三项措施的顶级大胆内的学术教师得分被归类为KBS。结果表明,每个SPH命令各种独特以及与肯尼亚国家部委的重叠关系。在124个全职教师中,我们在6个SPH中的4个中确定了7 kbs。第一项措施中得分高的那些得分不一定是第二个措施的同一个人在第二个中得分高。 KBS还位于沿“连接器/间度”测量范围内的宽范围内。我们建议综合评分而不是传统的“之间的中心地位”,提供了识别这些网络内KBS的替代方法。总之,SNA是识别肯尼亚学术政策制定网络的宝贵工具。进行类似网络研究的更多努力将允许SPH领导能够识别教师和政策制定者之间的现有联系,与其他SPHS和差距共享联系,以便为证据通知的卫生政策做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号