首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Policy and Planning >Do academic knowledge brokers exist? Using social network analysis to explore academic research-to-policy networks from six schools of public health in Kenya
【2h】

Do academic knowledge brokers exist? Using social network analysis to explore academic research-to-policy networks from six schools of public health in Kenya

机译:是否存在学术知识经纪人?使用社交网络分析探索肯尼亚六所公共卫生学院的学术研究-政策网络

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The potential for academic research institutions to facilitate knowledge exchange and influence evidence-informed decision-making has been gaining ground. Schools of public health (SPHs) may play a key knowledge brokering role—serving as agencies of and for development. Understanding academic-policymaker networks can facilitate the enhancement of links between policymakers and academic faculty at SPHs, as well as assist in identifying academic knowledge brokers (KBs). Using a census approach, we administered a sociometric survey to academic faculty across six SPHs in Kenya to construct academic-policymaker networks. We identified academic KBs using social network analysis (SNA) in a two-step approach: First, we ranked individuals based on (1) number of policymakers in their network; (2) number of academic peers who report seeking them out for advice on knowledge translation and (3) their network position as ‘inter-group connectors’. Second, we triangulated the three scores and re-ranked individuals. Academic faculty scoring within the top decile across all three measures were classified as KBs. Results indicate that each SPH commands a variety of unique as well as overlapping relationships with national ministries in Kenya. Of 124 full-time faculty, we identified 7 KBs in 4 of the 6 SPHs. Those scoring high on the first measure were not necessarily the same individuals scoring high on the second. KBs were also situated in a wide range along the ‘connector/betweenness’ measure. We propose that a composite score rather than traditional ‘betweenness centrality’, provides an alternative means of identifying KBs within these networks. In conclusion, SNA is a valuable tool for identifying academic-policymaker networks in Kenya. More efforts to conduct similar network studies would permit SPH leadership to identify existing linkages between faculty and policymakers, shared linkages with other SPHs and gaps so as to contribute to evidence-informed health policies.
机译:学术研究机构促进知识交流和影响以证据为依据的决策制定的潜力正在逐渐发展。公共卫生学校(SPH)可能扮演着关键的知识中介角色,既是发展机构,又是发展机构。了解学术政策制定者网络可以促进政策制定者与SPH的学术教师之间的联系的增强,并有助于确定学术知识经纪人(KB)。我们使用普查方法,对肯尼亚六个SPH的学术教师进行了社会计量调查,以构建学术决策者网络。我们通过两步方法使用社交网络分析(SNA)来识别学术知识库:首先,我们根据(1)网络中的决策者数量对个人进行排名; (2)报告称寻求他们寻求知识翻译建议的学术同行人数;(3)他们在“群体间联系者”中的网络地位。其次,我们对三个得分进行了三角划分,并对个人进行了重新排名。在所有这三个指标中,最高分位数中的教职员工得分均归为KB。结果表明,每个SPH都与肯尼亚国家部委有着各种独特且重叠的关系。在124名全职教师中,我们在6个SPH中确定了7 KB。在第一个指标上得分高的人不一定是在第二个指标上得分高的人。 KB在“连接器/中间”度量范围内的分布范围也很广。我们建议使用综合评分而不是传统的“中间性中间性”来识别这些网络中的知识库。总之,SNA是确定肯尼亚学术政策制定者网络的宝贵工具。开展更多类似网络研究的更多努力将使SPH领导层能够确定教师与政策制定者之间的现有联系,与其他SPH的共享联系以及差距,从而有助于制定基于证据的卫生政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号