首页> 外文期刊>Headache >Cluster Headache Clinical Phenotypes: Tobacco Nonexposed (Never Smoker and No Parental Secondary Smoke Exposure as a Child) versus Tobacco‐Exposed: Results from the United States Cluster Headache Survey
【24h】

Cluster Headache Clinical Phenotypes: Tobacco Nonexposed (Never Smoker and No Parental Secondary Smoke Exposure as a Child) versus Tobacco‐Exposed: Results from the United States Cluster Headache Survey

机译:群体头痛临床表型:烟草(从未吸烟,也不是儿童的父母的二级烟雾暴露)与烟草暴露:来自美国集群头痛调查的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To present results from the United States Cluster Headache Survey comparing the clinical presentation of tobacco nonexposed and tobacco‐exposed cluster headache patients. Background Cluster headache is uniquely tied to a personal history of tobacco usage/cigarette smoking and, if the individual cluster headache sufferer did not smoke, it has been shown that their parent(s) typically did and that individual had significant secondary smoke exposure as a child. The true nontobacco exposed (no personal or secondary exposure) cluster headache sufferer has never been fully studied. Methods The United States Cluster Headache Survey consisted of 187 multiple choice questions related to cluster headache including: patient demographics, clinical headache characteristics, family history, triggers, smoking history (personal and secondary), and headache‐related disability. The survey was placed on a website from October through December 2008. Results One thousand one hundred thirty‐four individuals completed the survey. One hundred thirty‐three subjects or 12% of the surveyed population had no personal smoking/tobacco use history and no secondary smoke exposure as an infant/child, thus a nontobacco exposed population. In the nonexposed population, there were 87 males and 46 females with a gender ratio of 1.9:1. Episodic cluster headache occurred in 80% of nonexposed subjects. One thousand and one survey responders or 88% were tobacco‐exposed (729 males and 272 females) with a gender ratio of 2.7:1. Eighty‐three percent had a personal smoking history, while only 17% just had parents who smoked with secondary smoke exposure. Eighty‐five percent of smokers had double exposure with a personal smoking history and secondary exposure as a child. Significant highlights from the survey Nonexposed cluster headache subjects are significantly more likely to develop cluster headache at ages 40 years and younger, while the exposed sufferers are significantly more likely to develop cluster headache at 40 years of age and older. Nonexposed patients have a statistically significant higher frequency of a migraine family history. The exposed population is statistically significantly more likely to have a history of head trauma 19% vs the nonexposed population 10% ( P ?=?.02). Tobacco exposed are significantly more likely to transition from episodic to chronic cluster headache (23% vs 14%, P ?=?.02). Cranial autonomic symptoms as well as agitation are more common in tobacco exposed. Nonexposed are less likely to have specific cluster headache triggers. Exposed are significantly more likely to be triggered by alcohol. Tobacco exposed are significantly heavier caffeine users than nonexposed. Nonexposed are significantly more likely to have cluster headache cycles that vary throughout the year than exposed (52% vs 40%, P ?=?.02). Exposed are much more likely to develop cluster headache from 12 am to 6 am than non exposed. Exposed experience significantly more frequent attacks per day and longer duration cycles than nonexposed. A significantly larger percent of the exposed population (57%) has suicidal ideations with their syndrome than nonexposed (43%) ( P ?=?.003). In regard to disability, both subtypes are disabled by their headaches, but exposed have more work related disability and lost home‐days from headache. Both subgroups have a poor overall response to preventive and abortive medication outside of inhaled oxygen and injectable sumatriptan. Conclusion Cluster headache sufferers who were never exposed to tobacco (personal or secondary as a child) appear to present uniquely compared to the tobacco exposed subgroup. The tobacco exposed clinical phenotype appears to have a more severe syndrome based on attack frequency, cycle duration, and headache related disability. Tobacco exposure is associated with cluster headache chronification. The nonexposed subtype appears to have an earlier age of onset, higher rate of familial
机译:目的展示美国群集头痛调查的结果比较烟草非爆炸和烟草暴露的簇头痛患者的临床介绍。背景集群头痛与烟草使用/吸烟的个人历史有独特的束缚,如果个体群体头痛患者没有吸烟,则已经表明他们的父母通常是这样做的,并且该个人具有显着的二次烟雾暴露作为一个孩子。暴露(无个人或二次曝光)群体头痛患者的真正的Nontobacco从未完全研究过。方法使用与群集头痛有关的187个多项选择问题,包括:患者人口统计,临床头痛特征,家族史,触发器,吸烟历史(个人和中学)以及与头痛相关的残疾的多项选择问题组成。该调查从10月到2008年10月的一个网站上。结果一千一百名三十四人完成了调查。一百三十三名科目或12%的受访人口没有人们的吸烟/烟草使用历史,并且作为婴儿/儿童没有次要烟雾暴露,从而露出缺点暴露的人口。在非缺陷的人群中,有87名男性和46名女性,性别比例为1.9:1。在80%的非引发科目中发生了eoisodic群体头痛。一千个和一个调查响应者或88%的烟草暴露(729名男性和272名女性),性别比例为2.7:1。百分之八十三个人有私人吸烟历史,而只有17%的人只有患有次要烟雾暴露的父母。百分之八十五只吸烟者随着人身吸烟历史和儿童的二次暴露而接受两次接触。 Survey Overposed Cluster Headache主题的显着亮点在40岁及以下的年龄越来越容易发生群体头痛,而暴露的患者在40岁及以上的40岁以上更有可能发展群体头痛。非爆炸性患者具有统计上显着的偏头痛家族历史的较高频率。暴露的人口统计学上更容易有19%的头部创伤史19%vs10%(p?= 02)。暴露的烟草明显更容易从慢性簇头痛转变为慢性簇头痛(23%vs 14%,p?= 02)。在暴露的烟草中,颅自主症状以及搅拌更常见。非缺点不太可能具有特定的群集头痛触发器。暴露的是醇的显着触发。暴露的烟草含量明显较重较重的咖啡因使用者。没有缺点更有可能在整个年份中变化的簇头痛周期(52%与40%,p?= 02)。暴露的可能更有可能从12点到早上6点开始群体头痛而不是未暴露。暴露的体验明显更频繁的每天攻击和比未引用的持续时间循环更长。百分比的暴露群体(57%)的显着较大百分比具有自杀性思想,其综合征比未引入(43%)(p?= 003)。关于残疾,两种亚型被他们的头痛禁用,但暴露有更多的工作相关残疾,并且从头痛中丢失了家庭。两种亚组对吸入氧气和注射族族曲坦外的预防性和中止用药的总体反应差。结论与烟草暴露的亚组相比,从未暴露于烟草(作为儿童个人或儿童的个人或次级)的群体头痛患者似乎是独特的。烟草暴露的临床表型似乎具有更严重的综合征,基于攻击频率,循环持续时间和头痛相关的残疾。烟草曝光与集群头痛计时相关联。非曝光的亚型似乎具有早期的发病年龄,家庭率较高

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号